Authors

1 MA, Department of English, Abadeh Branch, Islamic Azad University

2 PhD, Department of English, Abadeh Branch, Islamic Azad University

Abstract

 
The present study was an attempt to examine the effect of the degree of contextualization on reading and listening comprehension tests. In other words, it was intended to check the performance of the learners providing with high contextualized input compared to those who received low contextualized input. In doing so, 36 intermediate learners from an English Language Institute, participated in this study. Following that, two kinds of reading comprehension tests, more contextualized and less contextualized, and two kinds of listening comprehension tests, more contextualized and less contextualized, were designed. The data collected from the participants were analyzed by using t-test analysis. Findings revealed that there was a significant difference between the mean score of more contextualized input and less contextualized input in both reading and listening comprehension tests. However, the results of the present study showed that contextualization seemed not to have any significant effect on the reading and listening. It was concluded that both learners' proficiency level and degree of contextualization should be considered when designing listening and reading comprehension tests.
 

Keywords

Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beers, K. (2003). When kids can’t read, what teachers can do: A guide for teachers 6-12. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
Buck, G. (1991). The testing of listening comprehension: An introspective study. Language Testing, 8, 67-91
Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cummins, J. (1983). Language proficiency and academic achievement. Rowley, MS: Newbury House.
Flowerdew, J. (1994). Academic listening: Research perspective. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Harris, D. P. (1968). Testing English as a second language. New York: McGraw Hill.
Henning, G. (1991). Study of the effect of contextualization and familiarization on responses to the TOEFL vocabulary items. New Jersey: Educational Testing Service.
Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, L., & Gundersen, E. (2011). Select reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Long, D. (1989). Second language listening comprehension: A schema-theoretic perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 73(1),32-40
McDonough, S. H. (1995). Strategy and skill in learning a foreign language. London: Edward Arnold.
Öztürk, G. (2012). The Effect of context in achievement vocabulary tests. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 2(4), 126-134.
Qian, D. (2008). From single words to passages: Contextual effects on predictive power of vocabulary measures for assessing reading performance. Language Assessment Quarterly, 5(1), 1-19.
Thompson, I. (1995). Assessment of second/foreign language listening comprehension. In D. J. Mendelsohn, & J. Rubin (Eds.), A guide for the teaching of second language listening (pp. 31-58). San Diego, CA: Dominie Press.
Webb, S. (2008). The effects of context on incidental vocabulary learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(2), 1-4.
Zoghi, M., & Mirzaei, M. (2014). A comparative study of textual and visual contextualization on Iranian EFL learners' vocabulary learning. International Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 2, 31-40.