Authors

1 Professor of TEFL, Department of Foreign Languages, Shiraz University

2 PhD student of TEFL, Shiraz University

Abstract

The teaching of grammar plays a central role in every EFL classroom. This paper attempts to study the learning of grammar implicitly through exposing the language learners to as much authentic language as possible in interaction and practices of socialization in order to make grammar a byproduct of communication. It is believed that just by being exposed to lots of explicit grammar rules, the learners may not be able to learn and use correct grammar in everyday communication. In other words, language is not ready-made or ready-given. Language learners should benefit from opportunities for interaction with both the physical and social world, a combination of perception, interpretation, and action, i.e. an active relationship or engagement with the environment, the teacher and their peers through mediation. There are three core elements in the treatment: consciousness-raising (helping to raise students’ awareness about grammatical features), practice, and feedback.
Thirty four EFL students participated in the study, seventeen of whom were randomly assigned to the control group and the other seventeen to the experimental group. Both groups also completed a questionnaire on a five-point scale of agreement. The participants of the experimental group who received treatment showed a better result on their posttest. Moreover, the main findings of the study showed a positive attitude of the learners towards implicit grammar instruction in general. This study is hoped to have tangible and practical implications for language teachers and language learners in Iran as well as in other countries.

Keywords

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education. Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Carter, R., & McCarthy M. (1995). Grammar and the spoken language. Applied  linguistics16(2), 141-158.
Chomsky, N. (2000). New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. Norwood, NJ: AblexPublishing Corporation.
Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2002). Doing focus-on-form. System30(4), 419-432.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching (Vol. 9). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly40(1), 83-107.
Ellis, R., Loewen, Sh., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H. (2009). Implicit and  explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Washington, DC:
       Library of Congress.Farshchi, S. (2009). An exploration of teachers' beliefs about the role of grammar in Iranian
       high schools and private language institutes. Journal of English Language Teaching and  Learning1(212), 17-38.
Forman, E. A., & Kraker, M. J. (1985). The social origins of logic: The contributions of Piaget and Vygotsky. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development,(29),  23-39.
Forrester, M. (1999). Conversation and instruction within apprenticeship: Affordances for    learning. London: Kogan Page.
Fotos, S., & Ellis, R. (1991).Communicating about grammar: A task‐based approach. TESOL quarterly, 25(4), 605-628.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Greenfield, P. M. (1984). A theory of the teacher in the learning activities of everyday life.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Guerrettaz, A. M., & Johnston, B. (2013). Materials in the classroom ecology. The Modern  Language Journal97(3), 779-796.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London: Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and education5(2), 93-116.
Hinkel, E., & Fotos, S. (Eds.). (2001). New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms. New York, NY: Routledge.
Ho, P. V. P. (2014). The Effects of Communicative Grammar Teaching on Students' Achievement of Grammatical Knowledge and Oral Production. English Language Teaching7(6), 74.
Hopper, P. J. (1987). Emergent grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, CA.
Hopper, P. J. (1998). Emergent grammar. The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, ed. by Michael Tomasello, 155–75.
Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd.
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. New York, NY: Routledge.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Boston, MA: Heinle.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1991). Teaching grammar. Teaching English as a second or foreign language2, 279-296.
Levine, G. S. (2014). Principles for code choice in the foreign language classroom: A focus  on grammaring. Language Teaching47(03), 332-348.
Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective2(1), 39-52.
McArthur, L. Z., & Baron, R. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social  perception. Psychological Review90(3), 215-238.
McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second-language learning (pp. 109-147). London: Edward Arnold.
Moritoshi, P. (2000). To what extent is a grammar-translation approach based on   consciousness-raising?. Japan: ODL University.
Nagaratnam, R. P., & Al-Mekhlafi, A. (2013). Attitudes towards EFL grammar instruction. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network1(2), 78-105.
Neisser, U. (1987). From direct perception to conceptual structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norris, J. & L. Ortega. (2001). Does type of instruction make a difference? Substantive
       findings from a meta-analytic review. Language Learning, 51, Supplement 1, 157-213.
Nunan, D. (1996). An oganic approach to the teaching of grammar. Hong Kong Journal of
       Applied Linguistics1(1), 65-86.
Peirce, C. S. (1998). Selected philosophical writings, Vols. 1 and 2. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Piaget, J. (1978). Success and understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Reed, E. S. (1988). James J. Gibson and the psychology of perception. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Shotter, J., & Newson, J. (1982). An ecological approach to cognitive development: Implicate   orders, joint action and intentionality. Social Development: Studies of the Development of
       Understanding, 32-52.
Takahashi, E. (1998). Language development in social interaction: A longitudinal study of a Japanese FLES program from a Vygotskyan approach. Foreign Language Annals31(3),
       392-406.
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
van Lier, L. (Ed.). (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective (Vol. 3).Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997b). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 4: The history of the development of higher mental functions. R. W. Rieber (Ed.). New York: Plenum Press.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal   of Child Psychology and Psychiatry17(2), 89-100.