Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
1 Assistant Professor, English Department, Ershad Damavand University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of English Language, Isl.C, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran
Abstract
The increasing adoption of hybrid language instruction in the post-pandemic era has reshaped the ecology of language classrooms; however, little is known about how novice English language teachers negotiate their professional agency within these blended environments. Drawing on an ecological framework, the researchers investigated how these teachers steer pedagogical duality, role ambiguity, and shifting power dynamics as they adapt to the hybrid teaching environment. The experiences of four novice teachers in Iran were examined using in-depth interviews and weekly teaching journals. The findings revealed that novice teachers faced three key challenges in the hybrid setting: (1) negotiating the pedagogical duality of virtual and in-person instruction, (2) experiencing role epistemic uncertainty when adopting multiple teacher identities, and (3) managing contested power dynamics with students in the hybrid space. In response to these challenges, the novice teachers enacted their agency through iterative adaptations that strategically aligned task design with modal affordances, renegotiated their professional identities from knowledge authorities to distributed facilitators, and cultivated learner autonomy to address power asymmetries. The study contributes to the literature on teacher agency by highlighting the situated and temporal nature of agency enactment, especially for novice teachers facing disruptive educational changes.
Keywords
- ecological framework
- educational change
- hybrid instruction
- language teacher agency
- novice language teachers
Main Subjects
Ashton, K. (2020). Novice teacher agency in the multi-level language classroom. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 34(3), 242 256.
Benesch, S. (2018). Emotions as agency: Feeling rules, emotion labor, and English language teachers’ decision-making. System, 79, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.03.015
Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chen, M. (2022). Digital affordances and teacher agency in the context of teaching Chinese as a second language during COVID-19. System, 105, Article e102710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102710
Cheung, A. (2021). Language teaching during a pandemic: A case study of zoom use by a secondary ESL teacher in Hong Kong. RELC Journal. 54(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220981784
Cong-Lem, N., & Nguyen, M. H. (2024). Perezhivanie-agency dialectic: Examining Vietnamese EFL educators’ experiences and negotiation of dramatic classroom events. System, 123, 103347.
Damşa, C., Langford, M., Uehara, D., & Scherer, R. (2021). Teachers’ agency and online education in times of crisis. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106793
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., & Hökkä, P. (2015). How do novice teachers in Finland perceive their professional agency? Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 660-680. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044327
Gacs, A., Goertler, S., & Spasova, S. (2020). Planned online language education versus crisis‐prompted online language teaching: Lessons for the future. Foreign Language Annals, 53(2), 380-392.
Hamilton, M. L., & Clandinin, J. (2011). Unpacking our assumptions about teacher educators around the world. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 243-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.11.008
Hiver, P., & Whitehead, G. E. (2018). Sites of struggle: Classroom practice and the complex dynamic entanglement of language teacher agency and identity. System, 79, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.04.015
Jeon, J., Lee, S., & Choe, H. (2022). Teacher agency in perceiving affordances and constraints of videoconferencing technology: Teaching primary school students online. System, 108, 102829.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102829
Kartch, F. (2017). Narrative interviewing. In M. Allen (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of communication research methods. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/ 9781483381411.
Kayi-Aydar, H. (2015). Teacher agency, positioning, and English language learners: Voices of pre-service classroom teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.009
Kayi-Aydar, H. (2019). A language teacher’s agency in the development of her professional identities: A narrative case study. Journal of Latinos and Education, 18(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2017.1406360
Kayi-Aydar, H., Gao, X. A., Miller, E. R., Varghese, M., & Vitanova, G. (Eds.) (2019). Theorizing and analyzing language teacher agency (Vol. 70). Multilingual Matters.
Kim, L. E., & Asbury, K. (2020). Like a rug had been pulled from under you: The impact of COVID-19 on teachers in England during the first six weeks of the UK lockdown. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 1062–1083. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12381
Kong, K. (2022). Crossing the river by feeling the Stones: Understanding and integrating social justice in Chinese language class. The Modern Language Journal, 106(4), 726-743. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12804
Lee, S., & Jeon, J. (2024). Teacher agency and ICT affordances in classroom-based language assessment: The return to face-to-face classes after online teaching. System, 121, Article e103218.
Leijen, Ä., Pedaste, M., & Lepp, L. (2020). Teacher agency following the ecological model: How it is achieved and how it could be strengthened by different types of reflection. British Journal of Educational Studies, 68(3), 295-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2019.1672855
Mann, S. (2016). The research interview: Reflective practice and reflexivity in research processes. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137353368
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Miller, E. R., & Gkonou, C. (2018). Language teacher agency, emotion labor and emotional rewards in tertiary-level English language programs. System, 79, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.03.002
Miller, E. R., Kayi-Aydar, H., Varghese, M., & Vitanova, G. (2018). Editors’ introduction to interdisciplinarity in language teacher agency: Theoretical and analytical explorations. System, 79, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.07.008
Min, M., & Nelson, R. (2024). Exploring the factors influencing the development of teacher agency for culturally responsive teaching. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 6(3), 334-350.
Nazari, M. (2024). Ecological intersections of religious ideology, agency, and identity: Voices of Iranian English language teachers. Teaching English as a Second Language Electronic Journal (TESL-EJ), 28(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.28109s3
Nazari, M., & Kamali, J. (2024). An ecological inquiry into transnational English language teachers’ emotional vulnerability and agency. British Journal of Educational Studies, 73(1), 97-118.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2024.2388542
Nazari, M., De Costa, P. I., & Karimpour, S. (2023). The role of institutional policy in English language teacher autonomy, agency, and identity: A poststructural perspective. Language Teaching Research, 30(2), 885–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221143476
Nowruzi, M., & Khodamoradi, A. (2026). From collaboration to transformation: How CAR shapes preservice EFL teachers’ professional identity. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 13(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2025.21940.2511
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: What is it and why does it matter? In R. Kneyber, & J. Evers (Eds.), Flip the system: Changing education from the bottom up (pp. 134–148). Routledge.
Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2021). Balancing technology, pedagogy and the new normal: Post-pandemic challenges for higher education. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(3), 715-742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00249-1
Ruohotie-Lyhty, M., & Moate, J. (2015). Proactive and reactive dimensions of life-course agency: Mapping student teachers’ language learning experiences. Language and Education, 29(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.927884
Solati, M., Ahmadi-Azad, S., & Yousefi, M. H. (2026). Centralized curricula and classroom realities: A qualitative study of EFL pedagogy in Iran. Journal of Modern Research in English Language studies, 13(2), 77−99. https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2025.22752.2568
Sulis, G., Mairitsch, A., Babic, S., Mercer, S., & Resnik, P. (2023). ELT teachers’ agency for wellbeing. ELT Journal, 78(2), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccad050
Tao, J., & Gao, X. (2021). Language teacher agency. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108916943
Teng, F. (2019). Understanding teacher autonomy, teacher agency, and teacher identity: Voices from four EFL student teachers. English Teaching & Learning, 43(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321019-00024-3
Vähäsantanen, K. (2015). Professional agency in the stream of change: Understanding educational change and teachers' professional identities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 1-12.
Van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245–259). Oxford University Press.
Van Lier, L. (2008). Agency in the classroom. In J. P. Lantolf, & M. E. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 163–186). Equinox.
van Lier, L. (Ed.). (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Springer.
Wang, Y., Mu, G. M., & Zhang, L. (2017). Chinese inclusive education teachers’ agency within temporal-relational conAtexts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.009
Weinmann, M., Neilsen, R., & Cabezas Benalcázar, C. (2023). Languaging and language awareness in the global age 2020–2023: Digital engagement and practice in language teaching and learning in (post-) pandemic times. Language Awareness, 33(2), 347-364
Weng, Z., Jingyi Zhu, J., & Kim, G. J. Y. (2019). English language teacher agency in classroom-based empirical studies: A research synthesis. TESOL International Journal, 14(1), 37–61. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1244103.pdf
Withagen, R., Araújo, D., & De Poel, H. J. (2017). Inviting affordances and agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 45, 11-18.
Yazan, B., Pentón Herrera, L. J., & Rashed, D. (2022). Transnational TESOL practitioners’ identity tensions: A collaborative Autoethnography. TESOL Quarterly, 57(1), 140-167. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3130
)