Document Type : Research Paper

Author

College of Humanities & Social Sciences, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar

Abstract

Making valid inferences in research is a critical quality indicator. In quantitative research, making valid inferences from the sample data is rather straightforward and streamlined. That is, since quantitative researchers work with a sample, they use specific procedures to make inferences about the target population from which the sample was selected. This is usually done through inferential statistics procedures. However, when it comes to qualitative research, there is no such straightforward and streamlined procedure for making inferences. There are some general guidelines, but these are not regulated, and qualitative researchers use different procedures to make inferences from their data sources. This paper intends to discuss inference making in qualitative research by focusing on and bringing it into foreground. To shed light on this critical issue, the paper will discuss inference in quantitative and qualitative research, compare the procedures in the two methodological approaches, and discuss some criteria for making quality inferences in qualitative research. The paper will end with some concluding remarks.

Keywords

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). Sage.
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz, The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3-30). Basic Books.
Gilgun, J. F. (2004). Deductive qualitative analysis and family theory-building. In V. Bengston, P. D. Anderson, K. Allen, A. Acock, & D. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and methods (pp. 83–84). Sage.
Hadley, G., & Hadley, Hi. (2024). Grounded theory. In A. M. Riazi (ed.), Less frequently used methodologies in applied linguistics (pp. 127-148). John Wiley. 
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.
Riazi, A.M., Rezvani, R., & Ghanbar, H. (2023a). Trustworthiness in L2 writing research: A review and analysis of qualitative articles in the Journal of Second Language Writing. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(3), 10065.
Riazi, A.M., Ghanbar, H., Rezvani, R. (2023b). Qualitative Data Coding and Analysis: A Systematic Review of the Papers Published in the Journal of Second Language Writing. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 11(1), 25-47.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage.