Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
1 Department of Foreign Languages, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
2 Department of Foreign Languages, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
With the rapid rise of Q methodology across a range of disciplines in recent decades, an increasing number of researchers have embraced this innovative approach to reveal individuals’ opinions and beliefs as expressions of subjectivity, which has been greatly supported by the qualitative dimension embedded in the method. This makes Q particularly well-suited to applied linguistics (AL) as a branch of educational research, where participants’ perspectives often shape the core of the investigation. Yet, despite its growing use, the qualitative side of Q has received limited attention in the literature, and no clear framework currently guide Q researchers in how to plan, conduct, and transparently report this aspect. In this methodological review, we sought to examine 55 empirical Q studies in AL published in various journals over the past five years (2019–2024). We extracted the qualitative components and analyzed the interview features across three phases of the Q process, namely, pre-sorting, while-sorting, and post-sorting. It was discovered that to handle interviews in Q, a variety of methodological choices are practiced, with different frequencies. However, a considerable number of qualitative details were missing in the reports, particularly concerning post-sorting phase in general and interview approach in particular. The current study contributes to the ongoing discussion of qualitative practices in Q methodology as well as the broader discourse on transparency in qualitative research. Ultimately, we offer a practical checklist (CHIP-Q) to support the systematic planning and transparent reporting of qualitative phases in Q studies.
Keywords
*Represents the articles that are included in this review.
Akhtar-Danesh, N., Baumann, A., & Cordingley, L. (2008). Q-methodology in nursing research: a promising method for the study of subjectivity. Western journal of nursing research, 30(6), 759–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945907312979
* Alkhateeb, H., Al Hamad, M., & Mustafawi, E. (2020). Revealing stakeholders’ perspectives on educational language policy in higher education through Q-methodology. Current Issues in Language Planning, 21(4), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2020.1741237
* Alkhateeb, H., & Alshaboul, Y. (2021). Teachers’ understanding of the importance of students’ mother tongue(s) in Qatar’s international English-medium primary schools: findings from Q method research. Current Issues in Language Planning, 23(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2021.1925456
* Alkhateeb, H., & Bouherar, S. (2023). Sustainability and educational language policy in Arab higher education: findings from Q research. Current Issues in Language Planning, 24(5), 573–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2022.2155925
* Alkhateeb, H., Ellili, M., & Al-Lenjawi, B. (2024). Lessons the coronavirus pandemic has taught us: one language is not enough. Asian Englishes, 26(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2023.2174535
Banks-VanAllen, C. E., Midgley, B. D., & Brown, S. R. (2023). Single cases and the laws of subjectivity. Theory & Psychology, 33(6), 792–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543231185354
* Bonar, G., Slaughter, Y., Keary, A., & Davies, T. (2024). Supporting students with English as an additional language during emergency remote teaching: a Q methodology study. The Australian Educational Researcher, 52, 1065–1086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-024-00753-w
Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. Yale University Press.
Brown, S. R. (1996). Q methodology and qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 6(4), 561–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239600600408
Brown, S. R. (2019). Subjectivity in the human sciences. The Psychological Record, 69, 565–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-019-00354-5
Brown, S. R., & Montgomery, D. (Eds.). (2025). Q methodology and education: Methodology of educational measurement and assessment. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-87140-5
* Camenzuli, R., Lundberg, A., & Gauci, P. (2022). Collective teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism in Maltese primary education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 26(4), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2022.2114787
* Caruso, M., & Fraschini, N. (2021). A Q methodology study into vision of Italian L2 university students: An Australian perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 105(2), 552–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12713
* Chang, P., & Zhou, L. (2023). Pinpointing the pivotal mediating forces of directed motivational currents (DMCs): Evidence from the Q methodology. System, 117, 103095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103095
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2019). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
* Deignan, T., & Morton, T. (2022). The challenges of English medium instruction for subject lecturers: A shared viewpoint. ELT Journal, 76(2), 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccab084
Dieteren, C. M., Patty, N. J., Reckers-Droog, V. T., & Van Exel, J. (2023). Methodological choices in applications of Q methodology: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100404
* Ding, X., Liu, Y., & Peng, J. E. (2023). Straddling burnout and resilience: a Q methodology study among high school EFL teachers. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 46(2), 485–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2023.2193171
Dryzek, J. S., & Holmes, L. (2002). Post-communist democratization: Political discourses across thirteen countries. Cambridge University Press.
Ernest, J. M. (2001). An alternate approach to studying beliefs about developmentally appropriate practices. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 2(3), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2001.2.3.6
Finchilescu, G., & Muthal, S. (2019). Q methodology: Patterns of subjectivity in academic misconduct. In S. Laher, A. Fynn, & S. Kramer (Eds.), Transforming Research Methods in the Social Sciences: Case Studies from South Africa (pp. 130–148). Wits University Press. https://doi.org/10.18772/22019032750.14
Flick, U. (2023). An introduction to qualitative research (7th ed.). Sage Publications.
* Fraschini, N. (2023). Language learners’ emotional dynamics: insights from a Q methodology intensive single-case study. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 36(2), 222–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2022.2133137
* Fraschini, N., & Caruso, M. (2019). I can see myself …: A Q methodology study on self vision of Korean language learners. System, 87, 102147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102147
* Fraschini, N., & Park, H. (2021). Anxiety in language teachers: Exploring the variety of perceptions with Q methodology. Foreign Language Annals, 54(2), 341–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12527
* Fraschini, N., & Park, H. (2022). A Q methodology study to explore Korean as a second language undergraduate student-teachers’ anxiety. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 100132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100132
Gallagher, K., & Porock, D. (2010). The use of interviews in Q methodology: Card content analysis. Nursing Research, 59(4), 295–300. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181e4ffff
* Gyenes, A. (2021). Student perceptions of critical thinking in EMI programs at Japanese universities: A Q-methodology study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 54, Article e101053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101053
Irie, K., Ryan, S., & Mercer, S. (2018). Using Q methodology to investigate pre-service EFL teachers’ mindsets about teaching competences. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(3), 575–598. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.3.3
* Jodaei, H., Zareian, G., Amirian, S. M. R., & Adel, S. M. R. (2021). The interplay of teacher motivation and learner motivation: A Q method study. Current Psychology, 40, 1696–1710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0091-5
* Kim, S. E., Fraschini, N., & Park, H. (2023). Defining competencies for training non-native Korean speaking teachers: A Q methodology approach. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2023-0200
Kirschbaum, M. A., Barnett, T., & Cross, M. (2024). Combining Q methodology and interviews using mixed methods integration: an exemplar study exploring over-the-counter codeine misuse in Australia. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 28(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2024.2304939
* Kruk, M., Pawlak, M., Elahi Shirvan, M., Taherian, T., & Yazdanmehr, E. (2022). Potential sources of foreign language learning boredom: A Q methodology study. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.1.3
* Lu, J., Wang, Y., Shen, Q., & Gao, X. (2022). Investment in learning Chinese by international students studying Chinese as a second language (CSL). Sustainability, 14(23), 15664. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315664
* Lu, X., & Geng, Z. (2022). Faith or path? Profiling the motivations of multilingual Chinese as a foreign language teachers using Q methodology. Language Teaching Research, 29(3), 1345–1371. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221099079
* Lu, X., Zheng, Y., & Ren, W. (2019). Motivation for learning Spanish as a foreign language: The case of Chinese L1 speakers at university level. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a La Comunicación, 79, 79–98. https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.65649
* Lu, X., Zou, X., & Tao, J. (2020). Spanish language teachers’ pedagogical beliefs in Chinese universities. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a La Comunicación, 84, 41–53. https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.71994
* Lu, Y., & Xiong, T. (2023). The attitudes of high school students and teachers toward mobile apps for learning English: A Q methodology study. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100555
* Lundberg, A. (2019). Teachers’ viewpoints about an educational reform concerning multilingualism in German-speaking Switzerland. Learning and Instruction, 64, 101244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101244
* Lundberg, A. (2019). Teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism: findings from Q method research. Current Issues in Language Planning, 20(3), 266–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2018.1495373
Lundberg, A., De Leeuw, R., & Aliani, R. (2020). Using Q methodology: Sorting out subjectivity in educational research. Educational Research Review, 31, 100361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100361
Lundberg, A., Fraschini, N., & Aliani, R. (2023). What is subjectivity? Scholarly perspectives on the elephant in the room. Quality & Quantity, 57(11), 4509–4529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01565-9
* Mao, F., Gong, J., Huang, J., & Zhu, Y. (2024). Positive psychology probe: Assessing impact factors on CFL learners’ Chinese language learning through the EMPATHICS model and Q methodology. System, 126, Article e103500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103500
McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. (2013). Q Methodology. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384412
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), Article e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Newman, M., & Gough, D. (2020). Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application. In O. Zawacki-Richter, M. Kerres, S. Bedenlier, M. Bond, & K. Buntins (Eds.), Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application (pp. 3–22). Springer VS.
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136
* Peng, J. E., & Wu, L. (2024). Motivational profiles of Chinese university students majoring in Spanish: a comparative study. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(6), 1938–1955. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2035740
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., Britten, N., Roen, K., & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. University of Lancaster.
* Qi, Y., & Othman, R. B. (2023). Investigating Chinese tertiary EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices in the application of learning management systems using Q methodology. Arab World English Journal, 14(4), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no4.7
* Qin, L., Ouyang, X., Gao, Y., & Hennebry-Leung, M. (2024). Emotional and cognitive dissonance of teachers of Japanese as a foreign language towards technology-mediated language teaching curriculum: A perezhivanie perspective. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33, 889–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00799-x
* Raksawong, K., Thumvichit, A., & Solhi, M. (2024). Teachers as silencers: A Q methodology study into teachers’ characteristics contributing to unwillingness to communicate among foreign language learners. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2412773
Ramlo, S. (2016). Mixed method lessons learned from 80 years of Q methodology. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815610998
Ramlo, S. (2025). Examining Subjectivity with Q Methodology (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003511984
Riazi, A. M., & Amini Farsani, M. (2024). Mixed-methods research in applied linguistics: Charting the progress through the second decade of the twenty-first century. Language Teaching, 57(2), 143–182. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444823000332
Riazi, A. M., Rezvani, R., & Ghanbar, H. (2023). Trustworthiness in L2 writing research: A review and analysis of qualitative articles in the Journal of Second Language Writing. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(3), 100065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100065
Shemmings, D., & Ellingsen, I. T. (2012). Using Q methodology in qualitative interviews. In J. F. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvasti, & K. D. McKinney (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (2nd ed., pp. 415–426). Sage.
* Slaughter, Y., Bonar, G., & Keary, A. (2021). The role of membership viewpoints in shaping language teacher associations: A Q methodology analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 56(1), 281–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3068
* Slaughter, Y., Lo Bianco, J., Aliani, R., Cross, R., & Hajek, J. (2019). Language programming in rural and regional Victoria. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 42(3), 274–300. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.18030.sla
* Solhi, M., & Thumvichit, A. (2024). Dissecting subjective L2 (un)willingness to communicate among EFL learners: A Q methodology study. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2024.2349802
Stenner, P., & Stainton Rogers, R. (2004). Q methodology and qualiquantology: the example of discriminating between emotions. In Z. Todd, B. Nerlich, S. McKeown, & D. D. Clarke (Eds.), Mixing Methods in Psychology: The Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Theory and Practice (pp. 101-120). Psychology Press.
Stephenson, W. (1953). The study of behavior: Q technique and its methodology. Chicago University Press.
Stephenson, W. (1968). Perspectives in psychology: XXVI. Consciousness out subjectivity in. The Psychological Record, 18(4), 499–501.
Stephenson, W. (1978). Concourse theory of communication. Communication, 3, 21–40.
Stephenson, W. (2018). Q-methodology: Basis of quantized subjective science. Operant Subjectivity, 40, 21–35. https://ojs.library.okstate.edu/osu/index.php/osub/article/view/8714
Stone, T. E., Maguire, J., Kang, S. J., & Cha, C. (2017). Practical Issues of Conducting a Q Methodology Study: Lessons Learned From a Cross-cultural Study. ANS. Advances in nursing science, 40(3), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000164
* Thumvichit, A. (2022). Unfolding the subjectivity of foreign language enjoyment in online classes: A Q methodology study. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(7), 2427–2444. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2050917
* Thumvichit, A. (2023). I’m aware of that, but … : breaking the silence on moral distress among language teachers. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 36(3), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2023.2189268
* Thumvichit, A. (2023). Understanding emotion-regulation strategies among foreign language teachers in response to classroom stressors: Findings from a Q methodology study. Social Psychology of Education, 26, 1593–1620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09809-8
* Thumvichit, A. (2024). Enjoyment in language teaching: A study into EFL teachers’ subjectivities. IRAL–International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 62(2), 623–649. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0087
* Thumvichit, A., & Laoriandee, W. (2024). Evaluating English-medium instruction in higher education: EMI-QE. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 71, 101434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101434
* Thumvichit, A., & Phanthaphoommee, N. (2024). From basic care to beyond: A Q methodology study into the English communication needs among Thai caregivers of foreign older adults. Journal of Migration and Health, 10, 100253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmh.2024.100253
* Thumvichit, A., Tangkiengsirisin, S., & Vathanalaoha, K. (2024). Making sense of collective leadership in English teacher associations: Insights from Thailand TESOL’s committees. English in Education, 58(4), 346–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2024.2358752
* Vanbuel, M. (2021). How stakeholders see the implementation of language education policy: a Q-study. Current Issues in Language Planning, 23(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2021.1928427
* Wang, L., Chen, G., & Liu, S. (2024). Profiling the multifaceted identities among multilingual Tibetan college students learning Chinese and English in Xizang. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2024.2391065
* Wang, S., & Wang, Y. (2024). Exploring complex multilingual motivation types among Chinese students majoring in dual foreign languages: A Q method study. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2024.2384493
* Wang, Y., & Nikitina, L. (2023). A Q Study of Mainland Chinese English Language Learners’ Epistemic Beliefs. rEFLections, 30(1), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v30i1.264850
* Wang, Y., & Nikitina, L. (2024). Reading cards: Chinese students’ rationales for their language-related epistemic beliefs. SAGE Open, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241297443
* Wang, Y., Nikitina, L., Kaur, J., & Furuoka, F. (2022). Developing and piloting a Q-sample on Chinese language learners’ epistemic beliefs. Journal of Language and Education, 8(3), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.13590
* Wang, Z., Shen, B., & Zhang, Y. (2024). What makes EFL learning enjoyable for Chinese tertiary-level students? Insights from Q methodology. System, 123, 103337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103337
Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2005). Doing Q methodology: theory, method and interpretation. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(1), 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088705qp022oa
Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2012). Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method & interpretation. Sage.
Wolf, A. (2014). The interview in Q methodology: Readiness to adopt sustainable responses to climate change: SAGE research methods cases. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/978144627305014539121
* Wu, P., & Wang, Y. (2021). Investigating business English teachers’ belief about online assessment: Q methodology conducted during COVID-19 period. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 621–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00604-7
* Wu, X., & Forbes, K. (2022). Multilingual identity in schools: A Q methodological study with Chinese LOTE-as-L3 learners in international and public high school contexts. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 24(2), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2022.2134138
* Wu, X., & Forbes, K. (2023). Contextualising the temporal dimension in multilingual identity construction: A longitudinal Q methodological study with Chinese LOTE-learning public high school students. System, 116, 103090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103090
* Yılmaz Virlan, A., & Tomak, B. (2024). A Q method study on Turkish EFL learners’ perspectives on the use of AI tools for writing: Benefits, concerns, and ethics. Language Teaching Research, 29(7), 3190-3213.https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241308836
* Yuan, C., & Lo Bianco, J. (2022). L2 Chinese teachers’ beliefs about engagement strategies for students in Australia: Findings from Q methodology research. System, 106, 102792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102792
* Yuan, C., Zhu, Y., & Slaughter, Y. (2024). A Q methodological study into pre-service Chinese as a foreign language (CFL) teachers’ mindsets about teaching competencies. IRAL–International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2023-0228
* Zheng, Y., Lu, X., & Ren, W. (2019). Profiling Chinese university students’ motivation to learn multiple languages. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(7), 590–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1571074
* Zheng, Y., Lu, X., & Ren, W. (2020). Tracking the evolution of Chinese learners’ multilingual motivation through a longitudinal Q methodology. The Modern Language Journal, 104(4), 781–803. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12672
)