Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
1 Department of English, Language, Faculty of Humanities, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran
2 Islamic Azad University, Firouzkoh Branch, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
This qualitative study explores the perspectives of Iranian EAP educators regarding the alignment of the country’s English for Academic Purposes (EAP) curriculum with principles of critical English for academic purposes (CEAP). It also examines the changes these educators propose for the programs to better prepare the students for their professional goals. Semi-structured interviews and life history narratives were collected from eight university EAP instructors. Thematic analysis identified misalignments between Iranian EAP and the tenets of critical EAP including empowerment and holistic development. Iranian curriculum defined EAP goals around content learning and exams, neglecting broader development of critical thinking and problem-solving, and identity formation essential for professionalization. The EAP curriculum was incoherent, marked by inconsistent stakeholder goals, varied teaching methods, and insufficient involvement of instructors and learners in curriculum design. Additionally, the national EAP curriculum employed a dehumanized pedagogy, focusing on decontextualized grammar rules while neglecting to incorporate learners' backgrounds, knowledge, and strengths. Proposed changes include broadening objectives beyond content, enhancing curriculum coherence through collaboration, and humanizing instruction to nurture well-rounded professionals. The findings provide valuable insights to better align Iran’s EAP programs, teaching practices, and educational policies with the goals of critical EAP.
Keywords
- critical English for academic purposes
- EAP curriculum
- Iranian EAP educators
- humanized pedagogy
- professionalization
Main Subjects
Atai, M. R., Babaii, E., & Lotfi Gaskaree, B. (2017). EAP teacher cognition: A qualitative study of Iranian in-service EAP teachers' cognitions. Journal of Language Horizons, 1(2), 31-56. https://doi.org/10.22051/lghor.2018.15173.1055
Afshar, H. S., & Movassagh, H. (2016). EAP education in Iran: Where does the problem lie? Where are we heading? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 132-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.04.002
Afshar, H. S., & Ranjbar, N. (2021). EAP teachers’ assessment literacy: From theory to practice. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, Article e101042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101042
Alexander, O., Argent, S., & Spencer, J. (2008). EAP essentials: A teacher's guide to principles and practice. Garnet Education.
Atai, M. R., &. Tahririan, M. H. (2003). Assessment of the status of ESP in the current Iranian higher educational system. In K. Ahmad & M. Rogers (Eds.), proceedings of LSP; communication, culture, and knowledge conference (pp. 269-275). University of Surrey.
Atai, M. R., & Fatahi-Majd, M. (2014). Exploring the practices and cognitions of Iranian ELT instructors and subject teachers in teaching EAP reading comprehension. English for Specific Purposes, 33, 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2013.07.007
Atai, M. R., & Mazlum, F. (2013). English language teaching curriculum in Iran: Planning and practice. Curriculum Journal, 24(3), 389- 411. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2012.744327
Atai, M. R., & Nazari, O. (2011). Exploring reading comprehension needs of Iranian EAP students of health information management (HIM): A triangulated approach. System, 39(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.01.015
Atai, M.R. (2002). ESAP curriculum development in Iran: An incoherent educational experience [Special Issue]. Journal of Persian Literature and Human Sciences of Tehran Teacher Training University, 1(3), 17-34.
Belcher, D. (2009). What ESP is and can be: An introduction. In D. Belcher (Ed.), English for specific purposes in theory and practice (pp. 1-20). University of Michigan Press.
Belcher, D. D., & Hirvela, A. (2020). The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes. Routledge.
Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, politics, and practice. Routledge.
Benesch, S. (2009). Theorizing and practicing critical English for academic purposes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(2), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.09.002
Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and psychotherapy research, 21(1), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
Canagarajah, A. S. (2006). Negotiating the local in English as a lingua franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26, 197-218. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190506000109
Canagarajah, S. (2013). Critical academic writing and multilingual students. University of Michigan Press.
Chamberlayne, P., Bornat, J., & Wengraf, T. (2000). The turn to biographical methods in social science: Comparative issues and examples. Routledge.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage
Cogo, A. (2022). From global English to global Englishes: Questioning current approaches to ELT materials. In J. Norton & H. Buchanan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of materials development for language teaching (pp. 93-108). Routledge.
Dearden, J. (2014). English as a medium of instruction - a growing global phenomenon. British Council.
Derakhshan, A., Karimpour, S., & Nazari, M. (2023). Most of us are not feeling well: Exploring Iranian EAP practitioners’ emotions and identities. Ibérica, 45, 317-344. https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-2784.45.317
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
Flowerdew, J. (2016). English for specific academic purposes writing: Making the case. Writing & Pedagogy, 8(1), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v8i1.30051
Flowerdew, J., & Costley, T. (2014). A multidimensional approach to teaching academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 13, 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.11.003
Flowerdew, J., & Peacock, M. (2001). Issues in EAP: A preliminary perspective. In J. Flowerdew, & M. Peacock, (Ed.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes (pp. 8-24). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524766.004
Goodson, I. F., & Sikes, P. (2001). Studying teachers’ life histories and professional practice. In P. Sikes (Ed.), Life history research in educational settings- learning from lives (pp. 57-74). Open University Press.
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press.
Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. Routledge.
Hyland, K. (2012). Disciplinary identities: Individuality and community in academic discourse. Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. (2015). Genre, discipline, and identity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 32-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.005
Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K., & Shaw, P. (2016). Teaching the spoken registers of academic English: A genre-based approach. Routledge.
Hyland, K., & Wong, L. (2019). Introduction. In K. Hyland & L. L. C. Wong (Eds.), Specialised English: New directions in ESP and EAP research and practice (pp. 1-6). Routledge.
Hyland, K., & Wong, L. (2013). Introduction: Innovation and implementation of change. In K. Hyland & L. Wong (Eds.), Innovation and change in English language education (pp. 1-10). Routledge.
Iranmehr, A., Atai, M., & Babaii, E. (2018). Evaluation of EAP programs in Iran: Document analysis and expert perspectives. Applied Research on English Language, 7(2), 171-194. https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2018.104481.1123
Jenkins, J. (2013). English as a lingua franca in the International University: The Politics of academic English language policy. Routledge
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching. Routledge.
Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage.
Leki, I. (2011). Understanding ESL writers: A guide for teachers. University of Michigan Press.
Lillis, T. (2013). Sociolinguistics of writing. Edinburgh University Press.
Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis: A Multimodal introduction. Sage
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (revised and expanded from qualitative research and case study applications in education). Jossey-Bass.
Movahhedi, T., Sarkeshikian, S. A. H., & Golshan, M. (2024). Iranian ESP teachers and students’ perceptions of critical English for academic purposes. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 11(1), 77-99. https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2023.18332.2193
Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2011). Identity, language learning, and social change. Language Teaching, 44(4), 412-446. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000309
Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2004). Critical pedagogies and language learning: An introduction. In B. Norton & K. Toohey (Eds.), Critical pedagogies and language learning (pp. 1-18). Cambridge University Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage
Pennycook, A. (1997). Vulgar pragmatism, critical pragmatism, and EAP. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 253–269.
Pennycook, A. (2017). The cultural politics of English as an international language. Routledge.
Pennycook, A. (2021). Critical applied linguistics: A critical re-introduction (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Richards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum approaches in language teaching: Forward, central, and backward design. RELC Journal, 44(1), 5-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212473293
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
Shahidipour, V., & Tahririan, M. H. (2017). Evaluation of newly developed EAP textbooks for the students of medicine published by SAMT. Journalof Modern Research in English Language Studies, 4(4), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.30479/elt.2017.1455
Sharifian, F. (2013). Globalisation and developing metacultural competence in learning English as an international language. Multilingual Education, 3(7), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-5059-3-7
Singh, P., & Doherty, C. (2004). Global cultural flows and pedagogic dilemmas: Teaching in the global university contact zone. TESOL Quarterly, 38(1), 9–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588257
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Tavakoli, M., & Tavakol, M. (2018). Problematizing EAP education in Iran: A critical ethnographic study of educational, political, and sociocultural roots. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 31, 28-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.12.007
Temple, B., & Young, A. (2004). Qualitative research and translation dilemmas. Qualitative Research, 4(2), 161-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794104044430
Toohey, K. (2000). Learning English at school: Identity, social relations and classroom practice. Multilingual Matters.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: The key to knowledge strategy. In E. L. Lesser, M. A. Fontaine & J. A. Slusher (Eds.), Knowledge and communities (pp. 3-20). Routledge
Williams, E. N., & Morrow, S. L. (2009). Achieving trustworthiness in qualitative research: A pan-paradigmatic perspective. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 576–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300802702113
)