Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of English Language Teaching, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of English Language Teaching, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Since Csikszentmihalyi's seminal work in 1975, the concept of flow has been extensively explored within the field of psychology. However, its application within foreign language teaching, particularly in the realm of digital language instruction, remains relatively under-researched. To address this gap, this study examined the flow experience of 58 teacher educators tasked with teaching English reading skills in a virtual environment (Learning Management System - LMS) during the Covid-19 pandemic. This study employed a comprehensive flow model encompassing antecedents, experience, and consequences to: 1) examine the relationships between flow antecedents, flow experience, and flow consequences; and 2) investigate potential differences among teacher educators based on gender, academic degree, and teaching experience. Quantitative data analysis including correlation, One-way ANOVA, Independent-samples t-test, complemented by face-to-face interviews, uncovered noteworthy insights: Firstly, moderate to low correlations were found between the three stages of flow experienced by teacher educators in the computer-mediated environment. Secondly, male teacher educators displayed a moderately higher level of flow antecedents and flow experience compared to their female counterparts within the virtual setting. Nevertheless, the educators' academic degree and teaching experience exhibited a significant impact on the consequences of flow. These findings highlight the importance of improving teacher educators' technological proficiency within training programs by incorporating specific flow stimuli, such as clear tasks, appropriate task difficulty, relevant content, and the development of technology skills.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Bakker, A. B. (2005). Flow among music teachers and their students: The crossover of peak experiences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(1), 26-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.11.001
Basom, M. R., & Frase, L. (2004). Creating optimal work environments: Exploring teacher flow experiences. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 12(2), 241-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361126042000239965
Brunetti, G. J. (2001). Why do they teach? A study of job satisfaction among long-term high school teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28(3), 49-74.
Cho, M. (2018). Task complexity and modality: Exploring learners’ experience from the perspective of flow. The Modern Language Journal, 10(2), 162-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12460
Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (1988). Optimal experiences. Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey-Bass.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper and Row.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and effective teaching’ in J. L. Bess (ed.). Teaching well and liking it: Motivating faculty to teach effectively. Baltimore, MD.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Abuhamdeh, S. and Nakamura, J. (2005). Flow. In A. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 598-608). The Guilford Press.
Czimmermann, É. & Piniel, K. (2016). 8 Advanced language learners’ experiences of flow in the Hungarian EFL classroom. In P. MacIntyre, T. Gregersen & S. Mercer (Ed.), Positive psychology in SLA (pp. 193-214). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783095360-009
Dai, K., & Wang, Y. (2023). Investigating the interplay of Chinese EFL teachers’ proactive personality, flow, and work engagement. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2023.2174128
Davis, N. E., & Roblyer, M. D. (2005). Preparing teachers for the "schools that technology built": Evaluation of a program to train teachers for virtual schooling. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(4), 399-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2005.10782445
Dewaele, J.-M., Albakistani, A., & Ahmed, I. K. (2022). Is flow possible in the emergency remote teaching foreign language classroom? Education Sciences, 12 (7), 444. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070444
Dewaele, J.-M., Chen, X., Padilla, A. M., & Lake, J. (2019). The flowering of positive psychology in foreign language teaching and acquisition research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1088299
Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Egbert, J. (2003). A study of flow theory in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 499-518. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.60.5.549
Egbert, J. (2004). A study of flow theory in the foreign language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 60(5), 549-586. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.60.5.549
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2013). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
Fadaee, E., Marzban, A., & Najafi Karimi, S. (2021). Teacher autonomy and teaching styles: A gender-comparative study of Iranian EFL academics. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes10(3), 1-14. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.24763187.2021.10.3.1.9
Frase, L. (1998, April). An examination of teacher flow experiences, efficacy, and instructional leadership in large inner-city school districts, [paper presentation]. the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Diego, CA, April.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
Howard, S. K. (2013). Risk-aversion: Understanding teachers’ resistance to technology integration. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(3), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.802995
Ibrahim, Z., & Al-Hoorie, A. (2018). Shared, sustained flow: Triggering motivation with collaborative projects. ELT Journal, 73(1), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy025
Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, S. M. (2012). A model for predicting learning flow and achievement in corporate e-learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society15(1), 313–325.
Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 205-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12318
Killi, K. (2005). Content creation challenges and flow experience in educational games: The IT Emperor case. Internet & Higher Education, 8(3), 183-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.06.001
Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: What is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.770404
Konradt, U., Filip, R., & Hoffmann, S. (2003). Flow experience and positive affect during hypermedia learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 309-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00329
Li, R., Meng, Z., Tian, M., Zhang, Z., & Xiao, W. (2019). Modelling Chinese EFL learners’ flow experiences in digital game-based vocabulary learning: The roles of learner and contextual factors. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(4), 483–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1619585
Liu, H., & Song, X. (2021). Exploring “Flow” in young Chinese EFL learners’ online English learning activities. System, 96, 102-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102425
Mohammad-Salehi, B., & Vaez-Dalili, M. (2022). Examining EFL teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge and web 2.0 technologies using a structural equation modeling technique. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 9(2), 51-76. https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2021.14550.1779
Montoro, A. B., & Gil, F. (2019). Exploring flow in pre-service primary teachers doing measurement tasks. In M. S. Hannula et al. (Eds.), Affect and mathematics education (pp. 283-308). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13761-8_13
Nakamura, J., and Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The concept of flow. In C. R. Synder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology, (pp. 89–105). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13761-813
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544-555. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.544
Ro, Y. K., Guo, Y. M., & Klein, B. D. (2018). The case of flow and learning revisited. Journal of Education for Business93(3), 128-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2017.1417229
Rodríguez-Ardura, I., & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2021). Flow experiences in personalised e-learning environments and the role of gender and academic performance. Interactive Learning Environments29(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1572628
Rodríguez-Sánchez, A., Salanova, M., Cifre, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2011). When good is good: A virtuous circle of self-efficacy and flow at work among teachers. Revista de Psicología Social, 26(3), 427-441. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347411797361257
Rossin, D., Ro, Y. K., Klein, B. D., & Guo, Y. M. (2009). The effects of flow on learning outcomes in an online information management course. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(3), 87-98.
Rubie‐Davies, C. M., Flint, A., & McDonald, L. G. (2012). Teacher beliefs, teacher characteristics, and school contextual factors: What are the relationships? British Journal of Educational Psychology82(2), 270-288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02025.x
Russell, M., Bebell, D., O'Dwyer, L., & O'Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for preservice and in-service teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297-310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487103255985
Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Shneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158-176.
Shim, S. S., Finch, W. H., Cho, Y., & Knapke, M. (2022). Understanding teachers’ job satisfaction and flow: the dual process of psychological needs. Educational Psychology, 42(3), 316–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2021.1985970
Shin, N. (2006). Online learner’s ‘flow’ experience: An empirical study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 705–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00641.x
Skadberg, Y. X., & Kimmel, J. R. (2004). Visitors’ flow experience while browsing a Web site: Its measurement, contributing factors, and consequences. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(3), 403-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(03)00050-5
Sobhanmanesh, A. (2022). English as a foreign language teacher flow: How do personality and emotional intelligence factor in? Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 793955. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.793955
Tardy, C. M., & Snyder, B. (2004). That's why I do it: Flow and EFL teachers’ practices. ELT Journal, 58(2), 118-128. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/58.2.118
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65, 555-575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
Wang, P. Y., Chiu, M. C., & Lee, Y. T. (2021). Effects of video lecture presentation style and questioning strategy on learner flow experience. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(4), 473-483. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1754272
Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482-515. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00170