A Mixed-Methods Study into the Discipline-Specific Effect of Critical EAP on Reading Comprehension

Movahhedi, Tahereh; Sarkeshikian, Amir; Golshan, Mohammad

doi:10.30479/jmrels.2024.19950.2326

Document Type : research paper

Authors

¹ Department of English Language, Maybod Branch, Islamic Azad University, Maybod, Iran

² Department of English Language, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran

³ Department of English Language, Maybod Branch, Islamic Azad University, Maybod, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2024.19950.2326

Abstract

Although critical English for academic purposes (CEAP) has grown theoretically, more research is needed to explore it in more depth. This sequential mixed-methods study primarily aimed to examine whether the CEAP and traditional English for academic purposes (EAP) have different impacts on Iranian university students' English reading comprehension, and (if yes) whether it is discipline-specific. This study also intended to explore how traditional EAP students’ preferences aligned with the CEAP principles. To this end, a sample of 100 Iranian university students of computer sciences and architecture with intermediate level of English proficiency was initially selected through convenience sampling. They were then randomly assigned to two control groups and two experimental groups, consisting of 25 participants each. Then, two piloted researcher-made reading tests were administered to all groups as a pre-test. The experimental computer sciences and architecture groups were taught using the CEAP pedagogy. Hence, the syllabus was negotiated based on the CEAP principles. The control computer sciences and architecture groups received the traditional EAP as their placebos. They were taught the curricular textbooks. After the treatment, all groups were asked to complete their posttests. Two-way ANOVA results indicated that the CEAP groups significantly outperformed the traditional EAP groups on the posttests. It was also found that the effect of the CEAP pedagogy was not discipline-specific. Additionally, the results of qualitative data analysis revealed a lack of preference for the traditional EAP programs among the interviewees in favor of the CEAP. Implications are offered for EAP teachers, students, and material developers.

Keywords

References

American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association 2020: The official guide to APA style (7th ed.). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000

Anthony, L. (2018). Introducing English for specific purposes. Routledge.

Arnó-Macià, E., Aguilar-Pérez, M., & Tatzl, D. (2020). Engineering students' perceptions of the role of ESP courses in internationalized universities. English for Specific Purposes, 58, 58-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2019.12.001.

Atai, M. R., Babaii, E., & Nili-Ahmadabadi, M. (2018). A critical appraisal of university EAP programs in Iran: Revisiting the status of EAP textbooks and instruction. Journal of Language Horizons, 2(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.22051/lghor.2018.19961.1077

Atai, M. R., & Nazari, O. (2011). Exploring reading comprehension needs of Iranian EAP students of health information management (HIM): A triangulated approach. System, 39(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.01.015

Atai, M. R., & Tahririan, M. H. (2003). Assessment of the status of ESP in the current Iranian higher educational system [Conference presentation]. LSP: Communication, Culture and Knowledge Conference, University of Surrey, Surrey, England.

Ayat, M., Farahi, A., & Yosefkhani, N. (2014). English for the students of computer. Payame Noor University Press.

Beeston, S. (2000). The UCLES EFL item banking system. Research Notes, 2, 8-9.

Behboudi, S., Nazaribagha, K., & Farsani, M. A. (2022). Developing a pluralistic curriculum model for ESP in Iran. Journal of Language and Translation, 12(4), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.30495/jntell.2023.1980499.1048

Belcher, D. (2009). English for specific purposes in theory and practice.University of Michigan Press.

Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, politics and practice. Routledge.

Benesch, S. (2009). Theorizing and practicing critical English for academic purposes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(2), 81-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.09.002

Benesch, S. (2013). Considering emotions in critical English language teaching: Theories and praxis. Routledge.

Bingham, C., & Biesta, G. (2010). Jacques Rancière: Education, truth, emancipation. Bloomsbury.

Bronner, S. E. (2017). Critical theory: A very short introduction (Vol. 263). Oxford University Press.

Broukal, M. (1997). Peterson's TOEFL reading flash: The quick way to build reading power. Peterson's.

Bruce, I. (2021, March). Towards an EAP without borders: Developing knowledge, practitioners, and communities. International Journal of English for Academic Purposes: Research and Practice, 23–36.

Clapham, C. (2001). Discipline specificity and EAP. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes (pp. 84-100). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139524766.009

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3^rd ed.). Sage.

Darder, A. (2018). The student guide to Freire’s pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury.

Davidson, F., & Fulcher, G. (2020). Language testing and assessment: An advanced resource book. Routledge.

Deane, M., & O’Neill, P. (2011). Writing in the disciplines: Beyond remediality. In M. Deane & P. O’Neill (Eds.), Writing in the discipline (pp. 28–36). Palgrave

Derakhshan, A., Karimpour, S., & Nazari, M. (2023). Most of us are not feeling well: Exploring Iranian EAP practitioners’ emotions and identities. Ibérica, 45, 317–344. https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-2784.45.317

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.

Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. (1998). Developments in ESP: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge University Press.

Farahady, H. (2005). English for the students of architecture. SAMT.

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.

Freire, P. (2020). Pedagogy of the oppressed. In P. Kuppers & G. Robertson (Eds.), The community performance reader (1st ed., pp. 24–27). Routledge.

Geranpayeh, A. (2003). A quick review of the English quick placement test. Research Notes, 12, 8-11.

Haghani, M. (2005). Special English for the students of computer. SAMT.

Hashemi, M. R., & Babaii, E. (2013). Mixed methods research: Toward new research designs in applied linguistics. Modern Language Journal, 97(4), 828–852. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12049.x

Hayati, A. M. (2008). Teaching English for special purposes in Iran: Problems and suggestions. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 7(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022208088645

Helmer, K. A. (2013). Critical English for academic purposes: Building on learner, teacher, and program strengths. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(4), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.08.003

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (2012). Disciplinary identities: Individuality and community in academic discourse. Cambridge University Press.

Jakonen, T., & Duran, D. (2024). Learner-centered EAP practices: Managing agenda in tutorial interaction. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101345

Johns, A. M. (2012). The history of English for specific purposes research. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 5-30). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118339855.ch1

Jones, N. (2000). Background to the validation of the ALTE Can-do project and the revised Common European Framework. Research Notes, 2, 11-13.

Jordan, R. R. (2002). The growth of EAP in Britain. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1, 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1475-1585(02)00004-8

Karimi, M., & Ghorbanchian, E. (2022). Effects of adjunct model of instruction on EAP learners’ reading comprehension skill. Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 8(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.31261/tapsla.10432

Kavenuke, P. S., & Muthanna, A. (2021). Teacher educators’ perceptions and challenges of using critical pedagogy: A case study of higher teacher education in Tanzania. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.18.4.10

Khany, R., & Tarlani-Aliabadi, H. (2016). Studying power relations in an academic setting: Teachers’ and students’ perceptions of EAP classes in Iran. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.12.002

Kiany, G. R., & Khayyamdar, M. (Eds.). (2005). Proceedings of the first national ESP/EAP conference. SAMT.

Levitt, H.M., Bamberg, M.G., Creswell, J.W., Frost, D.M., Josselson, R., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA publications and communications board task force report. The American psychologist, 73(1), 26-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151

Li, Y. (2020). Educational change amongst English language college teachers in China. Springer.

MacDonald, J. (2016). The margins as third space: EAP teacher professionalism in Canadian universities. TESL Canada Journal, 34(1), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v34i1.1258

Macallister, C. J. (2016). Critical perspectives. In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (pp. 283–294). Routledge

Marr, J. W. (2021). The promise and precarity of critical pedagogy in English for academic purposes. BC TEAL Journal, 6(1), 132–141.

Martiarini, E. (2018). Reading for academic purposes: Problems faced by undergraduate students of visual communication design. Journal of English Language Education and Literature, 3(1), 16–26.

Meadows, L.M. & Morse, J.M. (2001). Constructing evidence within the qualitative project. In J.M. Morse, J.M. Swanson & A. J. Kuzel (Eds.), The nature of qualitative evidence (pp. 188-201). Sage.

Morgan, B. (2009). Fostering transformative practitioners for critical EAP: Possibilities and challenges. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(2), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.09.001

Mortenson, L. (2022). Integrating social justice-oriented content into English for Academic Purposes (EAP) instruction: A case study. English for Specific Purposes, 65, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.08.002

Movahhedi, T., Sarkeshikian, A., & Golshan, M. (2023). Iranian EAP teachers and students’ perceptions of critical English for academic purposes. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 11(1), 77-100. https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2023.18332.2193

Oxford University Press. (2001). The Quick Oxford Placement Test. Oxford University Press.

Prior, S. M., Fenwick, K. D., Saunders, K. S., Ouellette, R., O’Quinn, C., & Harvey, S. (2011). Comprehension after oral and silent reading: Does grade level matter? Literacy Research and Instruction, 50(3), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2010.497202

Rastegar-poor, H. (2003). English for the students of architecture. SAMT.

Robinson, P. C. (1991). ESP today: A practitioner’s guide. Prentice Hall.

Shahidipour, V., & Tahririan, M. H. (2017). Evaluation of newly developed EAP textbooks for the students of medicine published by SAMT. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 4(4), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.30479/elt.2017.1455

Sharndama, E. C., Samaila, Y., & Tsojon, Y. I. (2014). English for academic purpose: A tool for enhancing students’ proficiency in English language skills. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(2), 14–20.

Sharpe, P. J. (2010). TOEFL iBT: Internet-based text. Barron's.

Soodmand Afshar, H., & Movassagh, H. (2016). EAP education in Iran: Where does the problem lie? Where are we heading? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 132-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.04.002

Soodmand Afshar, H., & Movassagh, H. (2021). Towards a critical language teacher identity: Contributions of a critical teacher education course. Applied Research on English Language, 10(2), 89-110. https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2021.127277.1682

Tavakoli, M., & Tavakol, M. (2018). Problematizing EAP education in Iran: A critical ethnographic study of educational, political, and sociocultural roots. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 31, 28–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.12.007

Widdowson, H.G. (1983). Learning purpose and language use. Oxford University Press.

Wilson, K. (2016). Critical reading, critical thinking: Delicate scaffolding in English for academic purposes (EAP). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.10.002

Wingate, U. (2015). Academic literacy and student diversity: The case for inclusive practice. Multilingual Matters

Wingate, U., & Tribble, C. (2012). The best of both worlds? Towards an English for Academic Purposes/academic literacies writing pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 37(4), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.525630

A Mixed-Methods Study into the Discipline-Specific Effect of Critical EAP on Reading Comprehension

References

References

Volume 12, Issue 1January 2025Pages 125-146

Volume 12, Issue 1
January 2025
Pages 125-146