Document Type : research paper
Authors
1 Imam Khomeini international University
2 Department of English Language, Faculty of Humanities, Imam Khomeini International University
3 Centre for Research in English Language Learning and Assessment (CRELLA), University of Bedfordshire, Luton, UK
Abstract
There is currently a growing tendency to a meaning-based approach to the analysis of syntactic complexity in academic writing. While previous studies have offered illuminating insights into linguistic realizations of rhetorical structures in relation to syntactic complexity, they have typically analyzed lexicogrammatical features in a decontextualized manner. Drawing on a corpus-based cross-sectional design, this study takes a function-first approach to investigating the rhetorical functions of syntactically complex structures in research article (RA) abstracts in applied linguistics. To that end, a corpus of 270 texts from leading applied linguistics journals was constructed. Based on the model proposed by Pho (2008), we manually annotated the texts for the moves, and measured their syntactic complexity using phrasal, clausal, and global metrics. SPSS (version 25) was run for the analysis of data. Results of one-way MANOVA (multivariate analysis of variance) and Chi-square tests revealed significant variations among rhetorical moves in terms of clausal and phrasal complexity measures. The findings also showed that academic writers varied the complexity of their written structures according to their rhetorical goals. The results establish form-meaning mappings between syntactically complex structures and rhetorical functions. The findings carry pedagogical implications for student writers to adjust their prose using functionally appropriate complex structures following expert writers through comparing their own writing with that of expert writers to notice the gaps.
Keywords
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). The relationship of form and meaning: A crosssectional study of tense and aspect in the interlanguage of learners of English as a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13(3), 253-278.
Basturkmen, H. (2012). A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 134-144.
Bavdekar, S. B. (2015). Writing Introduction: Laying the foundations of a research paper. Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, 63(7), 44-6.
Beers, S. F., & Nagy, W. E. (2011). Writing development in four genres from grades three to seven: Syntactic complexity and genre differentiation. Reading and Writing, 24, 183-202.
Biber, D., & Barbieri, F. (2007). Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 263-286.
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5-35.
Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2012). Defining and operationalizing L2 complexity. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 21-46). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2014). Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26(1), 42-65.
Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2018). Syntactic complexity in L2 writing: Individual pathways and emerging group trends. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 147-164.
Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2012). Defining and operationalizing L2 complexity. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 21-46). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Casal, J. E., & Lee, J. J. (2019). Syntactic complexity and writing quality in assessed first-year L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 44, 51-62.
Durrant, P., & Mathews-Aydınlı, J. (2011). A function-first approach to identifying formulaic language in academic writing. English for
Specific Purposes, 30(1), 58-72.
Ebrahimi, S. F., & Chan, S. H. (2015). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and economics: Functional analysis of the grammatical subject. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 35(4), 381-397.
Esfandiari, R., & Ahmadi, M. (2022). A corpus-based analysis of noun phrase complexity in research article part-genres in applied linguistics and clinical medicine. Language Related Research, 13(3), 139-173.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
Fauzan, U., Lubis, A., & Kurniawan, E. (2020). Rhetorical moves and linguistic complexity of Research article abstracts in international Applied Linguistics Journals. Asian ESP Journal, 16(5), 2020.
Frear, M. W., & Bitchener, J. (2015). The effects of cognitive task complexity on writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 45-57.
Gillaerts, P. (2013). Move analysis of abstracts from a diachronic perspective: A case study. In N. L. Johannesson, G. Melchers, & B. Björkman (Eds.), Of butterflies and birds, of dialects and genres (pp. 49-60). Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis.
Harzing, A. W. K., & Van der Wal, R. (2008). Google scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8(1), 61-73.
Henry, A., & Rosenberry, R. L. (2001). A narrow-angled corpus analysis of moves and strategies of the genre: ‘Letter of Application’. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 153–167.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572.
Hunt, K. W. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. National Council of Teachers of English.
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 133-151.
Jiang, F. K., & Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscursive nouns: Interaction and cohesion in abstract moves. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 1-14.
Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. A. (2018). Measuring syntactic complexity in L2 writing using fine‐grained clausal and phrasal indices. The Modern Language Journal, 102(2), 333-349.
Lan, G., Lucas, K., & Sun, Y. (2019). Does L2 writing proficiency influence noun phrase complexity? A case analysis of argumentative essays written by Chinese students in a first year composition course. System, 85, 102116.
Lim, J. M. H. (2006). Method sections of management research articles: A pedagogically motivated qualitative study. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), 282-309.
Lu, X. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 474-496.
Lu, X. (2011). A corpus‐based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college level ESL writers' language development. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 36-62.
Lu, X., & Ai, H. (2015). Syntactic complexity in college-level English writing: Differences among writers with diverse L1 backgrounds. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29(1), 16-27.
Lu, X., Casal, J. E., & Liu, Y. (2020). The rhetorical functions of syntactically complex sentences in social science research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 44, 1–16.
Mazgutova, D., & Kormos, J. (2015). Syntactic and lexical development in an intensive English for Academic Purposes programme. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 3-15.
Moreno, A. I., & Swales, J. M. (2018). Strengthening move analysis methodology towards bridging the function-form gap. English for
Specific Purposes, 50, 40-63.
Nesi, H., & Gardner, S. (2019). Complex, but in what way? A step towards greater understanding of academic writing proficiency. In Online Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics: Taking Risks in Applied Linguistics, York St John University 6-8 September, 2018 (pp. 83-85). British Association for Applied Linguistics.
Omidian, T., Shahriari, H., & Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2018). A crossdisciplinary investigation of multi-word expressions in the moves of
research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36, 1-14.
Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college‐level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 492-518.
Ortega, L. (2015). Syntactic complexity in L2 writing: Progress and expansion. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 82-94.
Pallotti, G. (2009). CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 590-601.
Pallotti, G. (2015). A simple view of linguistic complexity. Second Language Research, 31(1), 117-134.
Parkinson, J., & Musgrave, J. (2014). Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for Academic Purposes students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14(1), 48-59.
Pho, P. D. (2008). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: A study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies, 10(2), 231-250.
Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2015). A meaning-based approach to the study of complexity in L2 writing: The case of grammatical metaphor. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 51-63.
Santos, M.B.D. (1996). The textual organization of research paper abstracts in Applied Linguistics. Text, 16(4), 481-499.
Saricaoglu, A., Bilki, Z., & Plakans, L. (2021). Syntactic complexity in learnergenerated research paper introductions: Rhetorical functions and level of move/step realization. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 53, 101037.
Staples, S., Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Academic writing development at the university level: Phrasal and clausal complexity
across level of study, discipline, and genre. Written Communication, 33(2), 149-183.
Swales, J. (1981). Aspects of article introductions. The University of Aston, Language Studies Unit.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Wang, S., & Beckett, G. H. (2017). "My Excellent College Entrance Examination Achievement"-Noun Phrase Use of Chinese EFL Students' Writing. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(2), 271.
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy and complexity. University of Hawaii at Manoa.
Youn, S. J. (2014). Measuring syntactic complexity in L2 pragmatic production: Investigating relationships among pragmatics, grammar,
and proficiency. System, 42, 270-287.
)