Document Type : research paper
Authors
1 Zanjan Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran
2 Head of English Language Center, University of Technology & Applied Sciences, Ibra, Oman
Abstract
Literature in the field of TESOL (Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages) recruitment practices suggests that the myth of monolingual speakerism has impacted the employment methods in various countries in the world. The monolingual (native) speaker has a privileged position in English language teaching, representing both the model speaker and the ideal teacher. Bilingual teachers of English are often perceived as less competent than their monolingual counterparts in Oman. The aim of the research was to critically explore and problematize the workplace and recruitment matters that discriminate between bilingual and monolingual English teachers in Oman. This research reports the findings of a small-scale qualitative study conducted at the English Language Centre (ELC) at the University of Technology and Applied Sciences in Oman through obtaining data via face-to-face oral interviews from six participants who were selected based on their personal willingness to get involved in this research. The results demonstrated that the native speakers’ fallacy is “alive and kicking” in Oman. The results of the study indicated that there is also a huge discrimination based on salary range between native and non-native teachers, despite doing same job. Colonial impact is another reason behind monolingual speakers’ preference. The impact of discrimination is that bilingual teachers of English are left feeling inferior. Hence it is essential to adopt policies, which install greater sense of job security to enhance motivation and innovation. The study suggests that recruitment practices in Oman must be reviewed to establish equality and to create a healthy working environment.
Keywords
Bradley J. M., & Katherine, E. Y. (2018). Adorno and Marcuse at the Barricades? Critical Theory, Scholar-Activism, and the Neoliberal
University. New Political Science, 40(3), 528-541.
Braine, G. (Ed.). (1999). Non-native educators in English language teaching. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Brutt-Griffler, J., & Samimy, K. (1999). Revisiting the colonial in the postcolonial: Critical praxis for nonnative English speaking teachers in a TESOL program. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 413-431.
Canagarajah, A. S. (2005). Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Clark, E., Paran, A. (2007). The employability of non-native-speaker teachers of EFL: A UK survey. System, 35(4), 407-430.
Cohen, C., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th Ed.). Routledge
Cook, V. (1997). Monolingual bias in second language acquisition research. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 34(1), 35-50.
Crystal, D. (1997). English as a global language (1st Ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Davies, A. (1991). The native speaker in applied linguistics. Edinburgh University Press.
Davies, A. (2003). The native speaker: Myth and reality. Multilingual Matters.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
Duff, P. A. (2019). Social dimensions and processes in second language acquisition: Multilingual socialization in transnational contexts.
Modern Language Journal, 103(1), 6-22.
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285-300.
Fuller, J. M. (2019). Ideologies of language, bilingualism, and monolingualism. In A. Houwer & L. Ortega (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of bilingualism (pp. 119-134). Cambridge University Press.
Holliday, A. (2006). Native-speakerism. ELT Journal, 60(4), 385–387.
Holliday, A., & Aboshiha, P. (2009). The denial of ideology in perceptions of Nonnative Speaker teachers. TESOL Quarterly, 43(4), 669–689. doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00191.x.
Karagiorgi, Y. (2012). Peer observation of teaching: perceptions and experiences of teachers in a primary school in Cyprus. Teacher
Development, 16(4), 443-461.
Kincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. (2005). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In Y. S. Lincoln & N. K. Denzin (Eds.), The sage
handbook of qualitative research (pp. 303-342). Sage Publications.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2016). The decolonial option in English teaching: Can the subaltern act? TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 66-85.
Langeloo, A., Deunk, M. I., Lara, M. M., Rooijen, M. V., & Strijbos, J. W. (2020). Learning opportunities of monolingual and multilingual
kindergarteners and their early literacy and executive functioning development. Early Education and Development, 31(8), 1224-1246,
DOI: 10.1080/10409289.2019.1697607.
Lippi-Green, R. (1997). English with an accent: Language, ideology and discrimination in the United States. Routledge.
Liu, L., & Kager, R. (2018). Monolingual and bilingual infants’ ability to use non-native tone for word learning deteriorates by the second year after birth. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 117-134. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00117
Liu, J. (1999). Non‐native English speaking professionals in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 33(1), 85-102.
Llurda, E. (2004). Non‐native‐speaker teachers and English as an international language. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(3), 314‐323.
Llurda, E. (2005). Non‐native language teachers: Perceptions, challenges, and contributions to the profession. Springer.
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Campanella B. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human communication research, 28(4), 587–604.
Medgyes, P. (1994). The non-native teacher. Macmillan.
Medgyes, P. (2001). When the teacher is a non‐native speaker. In M. Celce‐Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language, (pp.429-442). Heinle & Heine.
Mohamed, O. I., & Lobo, Z. (2020). A comparative study between monolingual and bilingual teaching methodologies of English in a Health Sciences University in the United Arab Emirates. English Language Teaching, 13(1), 73-84.
Moussu, L., & Llurda, E. (2008). Nonnative English speaking ESL teachers: History and research. Language Teaching, 41(3), 315‐348.
Munn, P., & Drever, E. (2004). Using questionnaires in small-scale research: A beginner’s guide. Scottish Council for Research in Education.
Neal, M. (2010). When Arab-expatriate relations work well: Diversity and discourse in the Persian Arab workplace. Team Performance
Management: An International Journal, 16(5/6), 242-266.
Nias, J. (1991). Primary teachers talking. In G. Walford (Ed.), Doing educational research (pp. 147-165). Routledge.
Nunan, D. (1992). Collaborative language learning and teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. LEA.
Pennycook, A. (2010). Language as a local practice. Routledge.
Phillipson, R. (2012). Linguistic imperialism alive and kicking. Guardian Weekly.
Schenck, A. (2020). Examining the influence of native and non-native Englishspeaking teachers on Korean EFL writing. Asian Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(2), 112-127.
Selvi, A. F. (2010). All teachers are equal, but some teachers are more equal than others: Trend analysis of job advertisements in English language teaching. WATESOL NNEST Caucus Annual Review, 1(1), 155–181.
Selvi, A. F. (2014). Myths and misconceptions about nonnative English speakers in the TESOL (NNEST) Movement. TESOL, 5(3), 573-611.
Shenton, A. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Educational for Information, 22(2), 36-75
Troudi, S. (2015). Critical research in TESOL and language education. In J. D. Brown, & C. Coombe (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to research in language teaching and learning (pp. 89-98). Cambridge University Press.
Valdes, G. (1998). The construct of the near‐native speaker in the foreign language profession: Perspectives on ideologies about language. ADFL Bulletin, 29(3), 4-8.
)