Comparative Rhetorical Move Analysis of Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Research Article Abstracts in Iranian vs. International Applied Linguistics Journals

Zand-Moghadam, Amir; Zhaleh, Kiyana

doi:10.30479/jmrels.2022.16708.2009

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Allameh Tabataba'i University

https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2022.16708.2009

Abstract

There is a shortage of studies on the generic structure of research article abstracts published in Iranian and international applied linguistics journals considering their employed research approach (i.e., quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods). Thus, this study endeavored to analyze the moves in 288 quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research (MMR) article abstracts in six Iranian and six international applied linguistics journals published between 2012 and 2019 following Hyland’s (2000) model. To analyze the data, the frequency of distribution and percentages of the rhetorical moves were estimated, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was run on the data. The findings indicated that the moves of Purpose, Product, and Method occupied the largest portion of local and international abstracts. Furthermore, in comparison to the international corpus, the Iranian corpus contained more moves based on Hyland’s (2000) model. A deeper analysis of both corpora revealed that the rhetorical moves were distributed almost evenly within quantitative, qualitative, and MMR abstracts, with the exception that in the international corpus, the Product move appeared significantly less in qualitative abstracts than quantitative and MMR abstracts. The most frequently used move patterns in both datasets were; I-P-M-Pr-C, P-M-Pr-C, P-M-Pr, and I-P-M-Pr. It can be concluded that applied linguistics researchers tend to follow Hyland’s (2000) model as much as possible when writing research article abstracts. Furthermore, although some divergences exist regarding the rhetorical moves frequency of distribution and patterning in qualitative, quantitative, and MMR abstracts in both local and international datasets, similarities are more remarkable than differences. The results can provide practical insights about the rhetorical and discursive practices associated with research article abstracts to applied linguistics researchers, students, and instructors.

Keywords

References

References

Al-Khasawneh, F. M. (2017). A genre analysis of research article abstracts written by native and non-native speakers of English. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(1), 1–13.

Amnuai, W. (2019). Analyses of rhetorical moves and linguistic realizations in accounting research article abstracts published in international and Thai-based journals. SAGE Open, 9(1), 1–9.

Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman.

Biook, B., & Zamanian, J. (2013). Genre analysis of Oxford and Tabriz applied linguistics research article abstracts: From move structure to transitivity analysis. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(12), 41–59.

Can, S., Karabacak, E., & Qin, J. (2016). Structure of moves in research article abstracts in applied linguistics. Publications, 4(3), 1–16.

Chalak, A., & Norouzi, Z. (2013). Rhetorical moves and verb tense in abstracts: A comparative analysis of American and Iranian academic writing. International Journal of Language Studies, 7(4), 101–110.

Ebrahimi, S. F., & Mohsenzadeh, A. (2018). Genre analysis of applied linguistics research article introductions published in international and Iranian local journals. Journal of Teaching English Language Studies, 6(3), 48–64.

El-Dakhs, D. A. S. (2018). Comparative genre analysis of research article abstracts in more and less prestigious journals: Linguistics journals in focus. Research in Language, 16(1), 47–63.

El-Dakhs, D. A. S. (2020). Are Arabic and English research article abstracts different? Rhetorical structure and interaction in focus. The Asian ESP Journal, 16(5), 6–32.

Ganji, M., & Derakhshan, A. (2020). Developing a checklist for evaluating research articles in applied linguistics. Teaching English Language, 14(2), 239–268.

Ghane, M. H., Mazdayasna, G., & Jabbari, A. (2021). Promoting genre knowledge of writing M.A. research proposal: The case of EFL students of applied linguistics. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(4), 36–53.

Hashemi, M. R., & Gohari Moghaddam, I. (2016). A mixed methods genre analysis of the discussion section of MMR articles in applied linguistics. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 242–260.

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Longman.

Hyland, K. (2002). Activity and evaluation: Reporting practices in academic writing. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 115–130). Longman.

Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192.

Jalilifar, A. (2010). Research article introductions: Sub-disciplinary variations in applied linguistics. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 2(2), 29–55.

Jalilifar, A., Hayati, A. M., & Namdari, N. (2012). A comparative study of research article discussion sections of local and international applied linguistic journals. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 9(1), 1–29.

Khany, R., & Malmir, B. (2020). A move-marker list: A study of rhetorical move-lexis linguistic realizations of research article abstracts in social and behavioural sciences. RELC Journal, 51(3), 381–396.

Li, X. (2020). Mediating cross-cultural differences in research article rhetorical moves in academic translation: A pilot corpus-based study of abstracts. Lingua, 238, 1–11.

Malmir, B., Khany, R., & Aliakbari, M. (2019). Journal article highlights in applied linguistics: An exploration into the rhetorical moves and their lexico-grammatical features. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(4), 49–63.

Marefat, H., & Mohammadzadeh, S. (2013). Genre analysis of literature research article abstracts: A cross-linguistic, cross-cultural study. Applied Research on English Language, 2(2), 37–50.

Marefat, F., Farahanynia, M., Bolouri, M., Chamani, F., & Soleimani, T. (2021). Generic structure of literature reviews in research articles: Iranian and international journals (Research paper). Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(3), 33–50.

Nwogu, N. K. (1997). The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 119–138.

Parodi, G. (2009). University genre in disciplinary domains: Social sciences and humanities and basic sciences and engineering. D.E.L.T.A., 25(2), 401-426.

Peacock, M. (2011). The structure of the methods section in research articles across eight disciplines. Asian ESP Journal, 7(2), 97–124.

Piqué-Noguera, C. (2012). Writing business research article abstracts: A genre approach. Ibérica, 24, 211–232.

Samraj, B. (2005). An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 141–156.

Santos, M. (1996). The text organization of research papers abstracts in applied linguistics. Text, 16(4), 481–499.

Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206–226.

Suntara, W., & Usaha, S. (2013). Research article abstracts in two related disciplines: Rhetorical variation between linguistics and applied linguistics. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 84–99.

Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M. (2019). The futures of EAP genre studies: A personal viewpoint. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 75–82.

Tullu, M. S. (2019). Writing the title and abstract for a research paper: Being concise, precise, and meticulous is the key. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, 13(1), 12–17.

Uzun, K. (2016). A genre analysis of the methodology sections of descriptive medical-surgical nursing articles. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 4(7), 65–81.

Wannaruk, A., & Amnuai, W. (2015). A comparison of rhetorical move structure of applied linguistics research articles published in international and national Thai journals. RELC Journal, 47(2), 193–211.

Weber, M., & Campbell, C. M. (2004). In other professional journals. The Modern Language Journal, 88(2), 302–309.

Yoon, J., & Casal, J. E. (2020). Rhetorical structure, sequence, and variation: A step-driven move analysis of applied linguistics conference abstracts. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 462–

Zand-Moghadam, A., & Meihami, H. (2016). A rhetorical move analysis of TEFL thesis abstracts: The case of Allameh Tabataba’i University. Issues in Language Teaching, 5(1), 1–23.

Zhang, B., Thuc, Q. B. T., & Pramoolsook, I. (2012). Moves and linguistic realizations: English research article abstracts by Vietnamese agricultural researchers. Asian ESP Journal, 8(3), 126–149.

Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies

Comparative Rhetorical Move Analysis of Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Research Article Abstracts in Iranian vs. International Applied Linguistics Journals

References

References

Volume 9, Issue 3
July 2022
Pages 25-47

Comparative Rhetorical Move Analysis of Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Research Article Abstracts in Iranian vs. International Applied Linguistics Journals

References

References

Volume 9, Issue 3July 2022Pages 25-47

Volume 9, Issue 3
July 2022
Pages 25-47