The Effects of Classroom Peer-feedback on Advanced Students' Self- Confidence

Authors

1 MA student at Department of English Language, Sepdian Branch, Azad University

2 Assistant professor at Department of English Language, Sepdian Branch, Azad University

Abstract

Many studies have been conducted on peer feedback in the fields of education in general and applied linguistics in particular. In spite of peer feedback’s popularity and benefits, there are some gaps in the peer feedback research. To fill the gaps, this study, through using a quasi-experimental design, tried to compare the effects of classroom peer-feedback with those of teacher-feedback on improving self confidence among Iranian EFL learners.  Recruiting two classes with 30 and 29 participants as control and experimental groups, the researchers gathered the data through administering a questionnaire. The data gathered from pretest and posttest questionnaires, were compared through t-test statistical procedure. The results indicated that both teacher and peer feedback resulted in higher self confidence among advance language learners. However, peer-feedback overrode teacher feedback in improving students' self confidence. The findings have implications for EFL teachers and materials developers.
 

Keywords


Article Title [Persian]

 تاثیر بازخورد همسالان در کلاس درس بر بهبود خود اعتمادی پیشرفته ی دانش آموزان

Authors [Persian]

  • سارا فیلی 1
  • محمدعلی آیت الهی 2
1 کارشناسی ارشد آموزش زبان انگلیسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد سپیدان
2 استاد یار گروه زبان انگلیسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد سپیدان
Abstract [Persian]

اکثر مطالعات در زمینه ی بازخورد گروه همسالان عموما در زمینه ی آموزش و به ویژه در زمینه ی زبان شناسی کاربردی انجام شده اند. علیرغم شناخت و مزایای  بازخورد گروه همسالان،  خلاء هایی در تحقیقات بازخورد گروه همسالان وجود دارد. برای پر کردن این خلاء ها، این تحقیق با استفاده از طراحی های نیمه تجربی سعی در بررسی اثرات بازخورد معلم و بازخورد گروه همسالان در کلاس درس با تکیه بر فاکتور روانشناسی و  اعتماد در چارچوب  موسسه های زبان دارد. با اجاره ی دو کلاس، به ترتیب با 30 و 29 شرکت کننده به عنوان گروههای کنترل و تجربی، محقق به جمع آوری داده ها از طریق توزیع پرسشنامه می پردازد. داده های جمع آوری شده از پرسشنامه های پیش تست و پست تست با استفاده از روش تست- t برای یافتن پاسخ های سوالات تحقیق مقایسه شدند. نتایج خاطر نشان ساختند که هر دو نوع بازخورد معلم و همسالان منجر به اعتماد و اطمینان بیشتر در میان یادگیرندگان زبان در مراحل پیشرفته می شود. اگرچه، تحلیل داده ها خاطر نشان می سازد که بازخورد همسالان در بهبود اعتماد دانش آموزان به بازخورد معلم برتری دارد. این یافته ها سازوکارهایی برای معلمان آموزش زبان دوم EFL و مدیران مواد آموزشی به همراه دارد.
 

Keywords [Persian]

  • بازخورد همسالان
  • بازخورد معلم
  • بازخورد کلاس درس
  • خود اعتمادی
Al-Enezi, F. (2005). Academic achievement and its relationship with anxiety, self- esteem, optimism and pessimism in Kuwaiti students. Social Behaviour and Personality, 33(1), 95-104.

Andrade, H. L.  (2010). Students as the definitive   source of formative   assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. In H. L. Andrade, & G. J. Cizek, (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp.118-130). New York: Routledge.

Bachman, L. (1993). Fundamental concepts in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bline, D., Lowe, D. R., Meixner, W. F., Nouri, H., & Pearce, K. (2001). A research note on the dimensionality of Daly and Miller’s writing apprehension scale. Written Communication, 18, 61-79.

Brok, P. D., Levy, J., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2005). The effect of teacher interpersonal behaviour on students' subject-specific motivation. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 7(7), 20-33.

Brown, H. D., (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. New York: Longman/ Pearson Education.

Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. (2002). Criterion-referenced language testing. Cambridge:             Cambridge University Press.

Cheng, W., & Tsai, C. C. (2012). Students’ interpersonal perspectives on conceptions of and approaches to learning in online peer assessment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 599-618.

Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (2005). Peer assessment of language proficiency. Language Testing, 22(3), 93-121.

Cheng, Y., Horwitz, E., & Schallert, D., (1999). Language writing anxiety: Differentiating writing and speaking components. Language Learning, 49, 417-446.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2008). Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Falchikov, N. (1995). Improving feedback to and from students. In P. Knight (Ed.), Assessment for learning in higher education. London: Kogan Page.

Falchikov, N. (2001). Learning together: Peer tutoring in higher education. London & New York: Routledge Falmer.

Hansen, J., & Liu, J. (2005). Guiding principles for effective peer response. ELT Journal, 59, 31-38.

Hsu, H. Y., & Wang, S. (2010). The impact of using blogs on college students' reading comprehension and learning motivation. Literacy Research and Instruction, 50(1), 68-88.

Izanlu, M., & Feyli, S. (2015). The effects of peer-assessment training on psychological and             psychometric factors: A case of mainstream high school education. Journal of         Language Teaching:   Theory And Practice, 1(1), 22-33.

Jahin, J. H. (2012). The effect of peer reviewing on writing apprehension and essay writing             ability of prospective EFL teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(11),      60-84.

Ketabi, S., & Torabi, R. (2013). Teaching academic writing in Iranian EFL classrooms: Teacher-initiated comments or peer-provided feedback? Iranian Journal of Research in English Language Teaching 1(2), 99-109.

Kubo, M. (2007). Examining self-confidence variables: An action research inquiry into pair taping (PT) efficacy. Accents Asia [Online], 1 (3), 42-62.

Kurt, G., & Atay, D.  (2007). The effects of peer feedback on the writing anxiety of prospective Turkish teachers of EFL. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 3(1),12-23.

Lee, L. (2010). Fostering reflective writing and interactive exchange through blogging in an advanced language course. ReCALL, 22(2), 212-227.

MacIntyre, P. D., Noels, K. A., & Clément, R. (1997). Biases in self-ratings of second language proficiency:  The role of language anxiety. Language Learning, 47, 265- 287.

Mazdayasna, G., & Tahririan, M. H. (2001). Peer-review, teacher feedback and EFL learners' writing development. AJAl, 5(1),55-67.

Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review 9, 129-144.

Peng, J. C. (2010). Peer assessment in an EFL context: Attitudes and correlations. In T. P. Matthew, Y. Watanabe, & S. K. Lee (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2008 second language research forum (pp. 89-107). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

Praver, M., Rouault, G., & Eidswick, J. (2011). Attitudes and affect toward peer evaluation in EFL Reading Circles. The Reading Matrix, 11(2), 89-101.

Sambell, K., & McDowell, L. (1998). The construction of the hidden curriculum: Messages and meanings in the assessment of student learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(4), 391-402.

Sarafian, I. (2011). Process assessment of a peer education program for HIV prevention among sex workers in Dhaka, Bangladesh: A social support framework. Social Science& Medicine, 75, 668-675.

Smith, H., Cooper, A., & Lancaster, L. (2002). Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment:  A case for student and staff development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International,39, 71-81.

Smyth, K. (2004).   The benefits of students' learning about critical evaluation rather than being summatively judged. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(3), 369-378.

Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2005). Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 325-341.

Topping, K. J. (2013). Peers as a source of formative and summative assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook   of research on classroom assessment (pp. 395-412). Sage Publications, London,

Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–76.

Topping, K. J.(2003).Self and peer assessment in school and university: Reliability, validity and utility. In M. S. R. Segers, F. J. R. C. Dochy, & E. C. Cascallar (Eds.), Optimizing new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (pp.55–87). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Van Droogenbroecka, F., Spruyta, B., & Vanroelenb, C. (2014). Burnout among senior             teachers: Investigating the role of workload and interpersonal relationships at work.           Teaching and teacher education, 43, 99-109.

Van Gennip, N., Segers, M., & Tillema, H. (2009). Peer assessment for learning: The             influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educational Research Review 4 (1), 41-54.

VanZundert, M., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., & VanMerriënboer, J. J. G. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 270-279.

Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 13-40.

Webb, N. M., & Farivar, S. (1994). Promoting helping behavior in cooperative small groups in middle school mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 369-395.