Authors

1 Associate Professor, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin

2 MA in ELT, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin branch

Abstract

The purpose of this study was twofold: (a) to identify the most frequent 4-word lexical bundles and (b) to analyse the functions these lexical bundles may serve. To those ends, a corpus of 4,652,444 in Food Science and Technology (hereafter FST Corpus) was developed, using 1,421 research articles (RAs) across 38 Food Science and Technology (FST) journals. Setting frequency and range as two criteria, we used AntConc to identify the most frequent lexical bundles. We also used Hyland’s (2008b) functional taxonomy to analyse the functions of the lexical bundles. The results of frequency and range showed 153 lexical bundles in FST Corpus. Functional analysis of the lexical bundles revealed 86 text-oriented, 63 research-oriented, and four participant-oriented lexical bundles, suggesting the central role text-oriented functions may play in FST. Implications for the explicit instruction of lexical bundles, for graduate students in FST, and for EAP curriculum developers and materials producers are discussed.
 
 

Keywords

Article Title [Persian]

بررسی پیکره محوری خوشه های لغوی در مقالات تحقیقی در رشته تکنولوژی صنایع غذایی

Authors [Persian]

  • رجب اسفندیاری 1
  • قدسیه توکلی معین 2

1 استادیار گروه زبان انگلیسی دانشگاه بین المللی امام خمینی (ره)

2 کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد قزوین

Abstract [Persian]

این کار تحقیقاتی دو هدف عمده را دنبال می کرد: 1. شناسایی پر بسامد ترین خوشه های لغوی چهار کلمه ای و 2. برسی نقش هایی که این خوشه ها می توانند داشته باشند. به همین منظور، یک پیکره 4.7 میلیون کلمه ای مشکل از 1421 مقاله تحقیقاتی از 38 مجله در رشته تکنولوژی صنایع غذایی تشکیل شد. دو معیار برای شناسایی خوشه های لغوی در نظر گرفته شد که عبارتند از بسامد و پراکندگی. از نرم افزار آنت کونک برای تحلیل داد ها استفاده شد. برای بررسی نقش خوشه های لغوی از مدل هایلند (2008) استفاده شد. نتایج تحلیل داده ا با دو معیار بسامد و پراکندگی، شناسایی 153 خوشه های لغوی در پیکره تکنولوژی و صنایع غذایی بود. برسی نقش خوشه های لغوی نشان داد که 86 تا از خوشه های لغوی نقش متنی داشتند، 63 تا نقش پژوهشی داشتند، و چهار تا نقش فردی داشتند. از نتایج این تحقیق می توان در تدریس صریح خوش های لغوی در در سهای نوشتن برای دانشجویان رشته تکنولوژی صنایع غذایی استفاده کرد.
 

Keywords [Persian]

  • خوشه های لغوی
  • پیکره
  • رشته تکنولوژی صنایع غذایی
  • پراکندگی

Adel, A., & Erman, B. (2012). Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach. English for Specific Purposes, 31(2), 81-92.

Allen, D. (2009). Lexical bundles in learner writing: An analysis of formulaic language in the ALESS Learner Corpus. Komaba Journal of English Education, 1, 25-36.

Alquraishi, M. (2014). Lexical bundles in an advanced antics writing class and engineering texts: A functional analysis. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado. Retrieved from fac.ksu.edu.sa/sites/default/files/alquraishi_mohammed_2nd.pdf.

Altenberg, B. (1998). On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word-combinations. In A. P. Cowe. (Ed.), Phraseology (pp. 101-122). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Anthony, L. (2004). AntConc: A learner and classroom friendly, multi-platform corpus analysis toolkit. IWLeL: An Interactive Workshop on Language e-Learning, 7-13. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Laurence_Anthony/publication/267631346_Proceedings_of_IWLeL_2004_An_Interactive_Workshop_on_Language_Elearning_2004/links/5458cd870cf26d5090acf212.pdf

Anthony, L. (2014). AntConc (version 3.4.3) [computer software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from http://www.laurenceanthony.net/

Beng, C., & Keong, Y. (2014). Functional types of lexical bundles in reading texts of Malaysian University English Ttest: A Corpus study. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 15(1), 77-90.

Biber, D. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: Benjamin.

Biber, D. (2010). Corpus-based and corpus-driven analyses of language variation and use. In B. Heine, & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 159–191). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Biber, D., & Barbieri, F. (2007). Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes, 26(1), 263-286.

Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2003). Lexical bundles in speech and writing: An initial taxonomy. In A. Wilson, P. Rayson, & T. McEnery, (Eds.), Corpus linguistics by the lune: A festschrift for Geoffrey Leech (pp. 71-92). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at …: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371-405.

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson.

Byrd, P., & Coxhead, A. (2010). On the other hand: Lexical bundles in academic writing and in the teaching of EAP. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 5, 31-64. Retrieved from http://faculty.edfac.usyd.edu.au/projects/usp_in_tesol/pastissues.htm

Chen, Y., & Baker, P. (2010).  Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language learning & technology, 14(2), 30-49.

Conrad, S., & Biber, D. (2004). The frequency and use of lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. Lexicographica: International Annual for Lexicography, 20, 56-71.

Cortes, V. (2001). Lexical bundles in context: A new taxonomy. Unpublished Manuscript, Northern Arizona University, Arizona.

Cortes, V. (2002). Lexical bundles in academic writing in history and biology. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation), Northern Arizona University, Arizon.

Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), 397-423.

Grabowski, L. (2015). Keywords and lexical bundles within English pharmaceutical discourse: A corpus-driven description. English for Specific Purposes, 38(2), 23-33

Hyland, K. (2008a). Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 41-62.

Hyland, K. (2008b). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4-21.

Hyland, K. (2012). Bundles in academic discourse. Annual review of applied linguistics, 32, 150-169.

Karabacak, E., & Qin, J. (2012). Comparison of lexical bundles used by Turkish, Chinese, and American university students. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 622-628

McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2006). This that and the other: Multi-word clusters in spoken English as visible patterns of interaction. In M. McCarthy (Ed.), Explorations in Corpus Linguistics (pp. 7-26). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Salazar, D. (2011). Lexical bundles in scientific English: A corpus-based study of native and non-native writing. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Barcelona. Retrieved fromhttp://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/handle/10803/52083/DJLS_DISSERTATION.pdf.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis. English in academic and research setting. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.