Portfolio-based Writing Instruction as a Venue to Provide Corrective Feedback on EFL Learners’ Writing Performance

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D in Applied Linguistics

2 MA in Applied Linguistics, University of Kashan

3 Professor of Shiraz University

Abstract

It is an underestimated topic whether or not providing corrective feedback through portfolio-based writing instruction can be effective. Hence, the purpose of the current study was to investigate the effect of providing corrective feedback through portfolio-based writing instruction on the overall and componential writing performance of the Iranian intermediate EFL learners. To that end, 44 intermediate EFL learners participated in a writing program aiming to develop the writing skill of the L2 learners. The participants were divided into the experimental group (N = 20) in which they received the corrective feedback on their writing through the portfolio-based writing, and the control group (N = 24) who received the traditional paper-and-pen corrective feedback on their writing. A pre-test/post-test design was administrated to address the purpose of the study. The results indicated that the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group both in overall and componential writing performance. Thus, it can be concluded that providing corrective feedback through portfolio-based writing can be constructive in developing intermediate EFL learners writing performance. This may be due to the features which portfolio-based writing brings to the L2 writing classroom including developing the motivation of the L2 learners to write, pushing them to be more autonomous in their learning, helping them to reflect upon their writing, and making the learners conscious about the process of writing. Thus, portfolio-based instruction can be thought of a collaborative way to provide corrective feedback on L2 learners writing performance. The study carries some implications for L2 writing teachers and learners.

Keywords


Article Title [Persian]

آموزش مهارت نگارش کارپوشه-بنیان به عنوان روشی مشارکتی در فراهم سازی بازخورد تصحیحی روی نگارش زبان آموزان انگلیسی

Authors [Persian]

  • حسین میهمی 1
  • فاطمه حسینی 2
  • رحمان صحراگرد 3
1 Ph.D in Applied Linguistics
2 MA in Applied Linguistics, University of Kashan
3 استاد دانشگاه شیراز
Abstract [Persian]

این موضوع که آیا ارائه بازخورد تصحیحی با استفاده از کارپوشه می تواند موجب رشد توانایی نگارش زبان آموزان شود یا خیر در پژوهش های این حوزه نادیده گرفته شده است. بنابراین، هدف از انجام این پژوهش بررسی تاثیر فراهم نمودن بازخورد تصحیحی از طریق آموزش نگارش کارپوشه-بنیان بر روی عملکرد نگارشی آنها به صورت کلی و با توجه به اجزای مختلف نگارش در بین زبان آموزان انگلیسی که در سطح متوسطه بودند، می باشد. در این راستا، 44 زبان آموز سطح متوسطه زبان انگلیسی در برنامه آموزشی نگارش با هدف پیشرفت مهارت نگارش زبان انگلیسی شرکت کردند. شرکت کنندگان به دو گروه آزمایش (20 زبان آموز) و گروه کنترل (24 زبان آموز) تقسیم شدند. در حالی که در گروه آزمایش بازخورد تصحیحی از طریق نگارش کارپوشه-بنیان دریافت می کردند در گروه کنترل از روش سنتی استفاده می شد. نتایج حاصل از این تحقیق نشان داد که گروه آزمایش عملکرد بهتری نسبت به گروه کنترل در نگارش کلی و اجزای نگارش داشتند. بنابراین می توان نتیجه گرفت که فراهم سازی بازخورد تصحیحی از طریق آموزش نگارش کارپوشه-بنیان نقش سازنده ای در پیشرفت عملکرد نگارش زبان آموزان سطح متوسطه دارد. این ممکن است به علت ویژگی هایی باشد که نوشتار پوشه کار-بنیان درکلاس دارد، از جمله ایجاد انگیزه یادگیرندگان زبان آموزان برای نوشتن، ترغیب آنها به یادگیری مستقل و کمک به آنها در بازنویسی نوشته ها، وهمچنین آگاهی بخشیدن به آنها در مورد ساختار نگارش.

Keywords [Persian]

  • نگارش کارپوشه-بنیان
  • بازخورد تصحیحی
  • اجزای نگارش
Bachman, L.  F. (2000).  Modern language testing at the turn of the century:  Assuring that we count counts.  Language Testing, 17(1), 1-42.

Bae, J. (2011). Teaching process writing for intermediate/advanced learners in South Korea. Retrieved  on March 5, 2019, from https://minds.wisconsin.edu/handle/1793/52570. A Doctoral Dissertation.

Birgin, O., & Baki, A. (2007). The use of portfolio to assess student's performance. Online Submission4(2), 75-90.

Bryant, S. L., & Timmins, A. A. (2002). Using portfolio assessment to enhance student learning. The Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong, China.

Chen, Y. M. (2006). EFL instruction and assessment with portfolios: A case study in Taiwan. Asian EFL Journal, 8(1), 69-96.

Crosby, C. (1997). Portfolio assessment in the Korean ESL writing classroom. Thai TESOL Bulletin, 10(2). Retrieved on March 5, 2019 from http://www.thailandtesol.org/?s=Portfolio+assessment+in+the+Korean+ESL+writing+classroom

Dafei, D.  (2007).  An exploration of the relationship between learner autonomy and English proficiency.  Asian EFL Journal, 9(1), 1-23.  

 Douglas, B. H. (2004). Language assessment principles and classroom practice. San Fransisco: San Fransisco State University.

Dysthe, O.  (2008).  The challenges of assessment in    new learning culture.  In A.  Havnes & L.  McDonald (Eds.), Balancing dilemmas in assessment and learning in contemporary education (pp. 15 32), New York: Routledge. 

Epstein, A.  (2005). Introduction to portfolios.  Retrieved March 5, 2019, from Pearson Education, INC. http//www.teachervision.fen.Com/page/4528.html?Detoured=l

Ersoy, F. (2006). Opinions of teacher candidates as to the portfolio assessment. Elementary Education Online, 5(1), 85-89.

Esfandiari, R., & Meihami, H. (2017). Impact of direct corrective feedback (dcf) through electronic portfolio (ep) platform on the components of Iranian EFL learners’ writing across levels of language proficiency. Journal of Teaching Language Skills36(2), 39-74.

Ferris, D. R. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes. A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 1-10.

Ferris, D. R. (2004). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ferris, D. R., Chaney, S. J., Komura, K., Roberts, B. J., & McKee, S. (2000). Perspectives, problems, & practices in treating written error. Colloquium presented at International TESOL Convention, Vancouver, BC.

Ferris, D. R., Liu, H., Sinha, A., & Senna, M. (2013). Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 307-329.

Frantzen, D. (1995). The effects of grammar supplementation on written accuracy in an intermediate Spanish content course. The Modern Language Journal79(3), 329-344.

Genesee, F., & Upshur, J.  A. (1996).  Classroom-based evaluation in second language education. New York:  Cambridge University Press.

Ghoorchaei, B., Tavakoli, M., & Ansari, D. N. (2010). The impact of portfolio assessment on Iranian EFL students’ essay writing: A process-oriented approach. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies10(3), 35-51.

Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2019). Academic emotions in written corrective feedback situations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes38(1), 1-13.

Hamayan, E.V.  (1995). Approaches to alternative assessment.  Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 212-226.

Hamp-Lyons, L. & Condon, W.  (2000). Assessing the portfolio: Practice, theory and research.  Cresskill NJ: Hampton Press.

Hamp-Lyons, L. (1991). Assessing Second Language Writing in Academic Contexts.  Norwood NJ: Ablex.

Hebert, E. A. (2001). The power of portfolios: What children can teach us about learning and assessment. the Jossey-bass education series. Jossey-Bass, 989 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94103.

Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1994). Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing. Journal of Second Language Writing3(2), 141-163.

Huot, B. (2002). (Re)articulating writing assessment for teaching and learning. Logan, UT.     

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2019). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge university press.

Jacobs, H., Zinkgraf, S., Wormuth, D., Hartfiel, V., & Hughey, J. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Rowley, MA:  Newbury House.

Khoshsima, H. (2006). The washback effect of alternative assessment techniques on students’ reading comprehension and writing ability. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. University of Isfahan, Faculty of Foreign Languages.

Lam, R. (2017). Taking stock of portfolio assessment scholarship: From research to practice. Assessing Writing31, 84-97.

Little, D. (2003). Learner autonomy and second/foreign language learning. Guide to Good Practice. Retrieved on April 10, 2019 from https://www.llas.ac.uk/resources/gpg/1409

Meihami, H., & Rashidi, N. (2018). The effect of topical knowledge on ESP learners’ writing quality: complexity, accuracy, and fluency measures. XLinguae, 11(4), 45-58.

Mirador, J. (1998). On my own, pretending you’re beside me: Autonomy in the making.  Teaching English for Specific Purposes, 11(1), 15-34.

Moya, S.  S. & O’Malley, J.  M. (1994).  A portfolio assessment model for ESL.  The Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 13(1), 13-36.

Murat, H., & H. Sibel.  (2010). The European language portfolio in ESP classes:  a case study of learner reflection and self-assessment.  European Journal of Social Science, 12(4), 671-684.

Nezakatgoo, B. (2011). The effects of portfolio assessment on writing of EFL students. English Language Teaching4(2), 231-241.

Nunes, A. (2004). Portfolios in the EFL classroom: Disclosing an informed practice. ELT Journal58(4), 327-335.

Roohani, A., & Taheri, F. (2015). The effect of portfolio assessment on EFL learners’ expository writing ability. Iranian Journal of Language Testing5(1), 46-59.

Saeedi, Z., & Meihami, H. (2015). E-portfolio as a corrective platform towards EFL students’ overall/componential writing performance. Teaching English with Technology15(4), 76-97.

Sharifi, A., & Hassaskhah, J. (2011). The role of portfolio assessment and reflection on process writing. Asian EFL Journal13(1), 192-229.

Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing20(4), 286-305.

Storch, N. (2018). Written corrective feedback from sociocultural theoretical perspectives: A research agenda. Language Teaching51(2), 262-277.

Taki, S. Heidari, M. (2011). The effect of using portfolio based writing assessment on language learning: the case of young Iranian EFL learners. Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(3), 129-142.

Tang, C., & Liu, Y. T. (2018). Effects of indirect coded corrective feedback with and without short affective teacher comments on L2 writing performance, learner uptake and motivation. Assessing Writing35, 26-40.

Tavakoli, M. & Amirian, Z. (2012). The effect of portfolio assessment on the development of metadiscourse awareness in EFL learners' writing in the academic context. Sheikhbahaee EFL Journal,1(1), 15-38.

Truscott, J. (1999). The case for “the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes”: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), 111-122.

Truscott, J. (2004) Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 337-343.

Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), 255-272.

Van Beuningen, C. G., De Jong, N. H., & Kuiken, F. (2008). The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners’ written accuracy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 156, 279-296.

Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Weiser, I.  (1992). Portfolio practice and assessment for collegiate basic writers.  In K.  B.  Yancey (Ed.), Portfolios in the writing classroom:  An introduction (pp.89-101).  Urbana, IL:  National Council of Teachers of English.