The effects of corrective feedback on Iranian EFL students' writing

Document Type: Research Paper


1 Islamic Azad University of Zanjan

2 Islamic Azad Unversity of Zanjan

3 Islamic Azad university of Zanjan, Iran


Matching the expectations of teachers and students is vital for successful learning. Few studies have investigated the effects of corrective feedback on Iranian EFL students. The sample of this research were 180 male and female teachers that teach language courses in an English Language Teaching program in language institutes in Zanjan and 350 students who were chosen through stratified random sampling. Two standard instruments were used in this study. PET Test, Fukuda (2004). The findings suggest that they believed that corrective feedback had a significant effect on their writing but the teachers did not think so. It is concluded that most of the feedback given by teachers were concentrated on grammatical errors and that the teachers’ view of feedback is based on the context, which might origin from absence of sufficient teacher training. With this in mind, giving feedback, or rather the right kind of feedback should perhaps play a better role in teacher education. Anyway, the fact that feedback is based on each context may be positive, because all students are different, even so teacher trainees might still take advantage from studying the provision of feedback.


Article Title [Persian]

تاثیر بازخورد اصلاحی بر نگارش زبان آموزان ایرانی

Authors [Persian]

  • امیر رضایی 1
  • سیروس ایزدپناه 2
  • علی شهنواز 3
1 دانشگاه آزاد زنجان
2 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی زنجان
3 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی زنجان
Abstract [Persian]

تطبیق انتظارات معلمان و دانش آموزان برای یادگیری موفق حیاتی است. مطالعات اندکی در مورد اثرات بازخوردی اصلاح شده در مورد دانشجویان EFL صورت گرفته است. نمونه این پژوهش متشکل از 180 معلم مرد و زن بود که در یک برنامه آموزش زبان انگلیسی در مؤسسات زبان زنجان تدریس می کردند و 350 دانش آموز که از طریق نمونه گیری تصادفی طبقه ای انتخاب گردیدند. در این مطالعه دو ابزار استاندارد مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. آزمون PET، فوکودا (2004). یافته های این پژوهش نشان می دهد که آنها اعتقاد داشتند که بازخورد اصلاحی تاثیر قابل توجهی بر نوشتن آنها دارد، اما معلمان چنین فکر نمی کردند. نتایج نشان دادند که بیشتر بازخورد معلمان بر اشتباهات دستوری متمرکز شده است و دیدگاه معلمان از بازخورد براساس محیطی است که ممکن است ناشی از فقدان آموزش معلم باشد. با توجه به این نکته، بازخورد دادن، و یا به جای آن، بازخورد مناسب باید در آموزش معلمان نقش مهمی داشته باشد. به هر حال، در حقیقت بازخورد بر مبنای هر محیط ممکن است مثبت باشد، زیرا همه دانش آموزان متفاوت هستند، حتی ممکن است کارآموزان معلم از پژوهش بازخورد بهره ببرند.

Keywords [Persian]

  • بازخورد اصلاحی
  • خطا
  • درک
  • ترجیح

Akiyama, Y. (2017). Learner beliefs and corrective feedback in telecollaboration: A longitudinal investigation. System64, 58-73.‏

Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second language Writing, 9(3) 227–57. DOI: 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00027-8

Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of second language writing, 14(3), 191-205. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001

Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2) 102–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004

Bitchener, J., & Storch, N. (2015). Written corrective feedback for L2 development (96). Multilingual Matters. DOI: 10.1002/tesq.62

Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, (3)12 96-267. DOI: 10.2307/3586012

Chiang, K. K. (2004). An investigation into students’ preferences for and responses to teacher feedback and its implication for writing teachers. Hong Kong Teachers’ Centre Journal, 3 98–115.

Diab, R. L. (2005). EFL university students’ preference for error correction and teacher feedback on writing. TESL Reporter, 38(1) 27–51.

Diab, R. L. (2006). Error correction and feedback in the EFL writing classroom: Comparing instruction and student preferences. English Teaching Forum, 3: 2–14.

Ellis, R. & Shintani, N. (2014). Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.1002/tesq.214

Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2) 97–107. DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccn023

Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M. & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36(3) 353–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001

Ferris, D. (1995). Can advanced ESL students be taught to correct their errors? CATESTOL Journal, 8, 41-62.

Ferris, D. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: a response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1) l–l1. 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80110-6

Ferris, D. R. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. DOI: 10.3998/mpub.2173290

Ferris, D. & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Laguage Writing. 10(3) 556–569. DOI: 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X

Frantzen, D. & Rissel, D. (1987). Learner self-correction of written compositions: What does it show us? In VanPattern B., Dvorak, T.R. & Lee, J. F. (Eds), Foreign Language Learning: A Research Perspective (92–107). Cambridge: Newbury House. GARCÍA MAYO M. P. & Alcón, E. (2014). Negotiated input and output/interaction. In Herschensohm, J. and Young-Scholten, M. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of second language acquisition (209–29). Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

Hamouda, A. (2011). A study of students and teachers' preferences and attitudes towards: Correction of classroom written errors in Saudi EFL context. English Language Teaching, 4(3) 128–41. DOI: 10.5539/elt.v4n3p128          

Harmer, J. (2001). Mistakes and feedback. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Essex, UK: Pearson Education.

Hedgcock, J. and Lefkowitz, N. (1995). Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 141-163. DOI: 10.1016/1060-3743(94)90012-4

Hendrickson, J. M. (1980). The treatment of error in written work. The Modern Language Journal, 64(2) 216–21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1980.tb05188.x

Hillocks, G. JR. (1986). Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching.

Komura, k. (1999). Student response to error correction in ESL classroom. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Sacramento, California State University.

Knoblauch, C. H. & BRANNON, L. (1981). Teacher commentary on students writing: The state of the art. Freshman English News, 10(2) 1–4.

Krashen, S. D. (1992). Comprehensible input and some competing hypotheses. In Courchêne, R., Glodden, J. I., St. John, J. & Therien, C. (Eds.), Comprehension based Second Language Teaching (19–38). Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.

Lee, I. (1997). ESL learners' performance in error correction in writing: Some implications for teaching. System, 25(4), 465-477. DOI: 10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00045-6

Lee, I. (2004). Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong.

Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4) 285–312. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.08.001

Lee, I. (2005). Error correction in the L2 writing classroom: What do students think? TESL Canada Journal, 22(2) 1–16. DOI: 10.18806/tesl.v22i2.84       

Lee, I. (2013). Research into practice: Written corrective feedback. Language Teaching, 46(1), 108. doi:10.1017/S0261444812000390

Leki, I. (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24(3) 203–18. DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1991.tb00464.x

Lourdunathan, J., &Menon, S. (2017). Developing speaking skills through interaction strategy training. The English Teacher, 34, 1-18.

Norouzian, R. (2012). Written error feedback from perception to practice: A feedback on feedback. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(1) 11–22. doi:10.4304/jltr.3.1.11-22

Nunan, D. (1991). Language Teaching Methodology. Hemel Hemstead Herts: Prentice Hall.

Robb, T., Ross, S. & Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20(1) 83–95. DOI: 10.2307/3586390

Russell , J., & SPADA, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for second language acquisition: A meta-analysis of the research. In Norris, J. M. & Ortega, L. (Eds.), Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching (133–64). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x

Sermsook, K., Liamnimitr, J., & Pochakorn, R. (2016). The Impact of Teacher Corrective Feedback on EFL Student Writers’ Grammatical Improvement. English Language Teaching, 10(10), 43. DOI: 10.5539/elt.v10n10p43          

Sheen , Y., Wright, D. & Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System, 37(4) 556–69. DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2009.09.002

Sheen, Y. (2010). The role of oral and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2) 169–79. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263109990489

Sheen, Y. (2011). Corrective Feedback, Individual Differences and Second Language Learning. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI:  10.1016/j.system.2013.07.003

Sheppard, K. (1992). Two feedback types: Do they make a difference? RELC Journal, 23(1) 10-103. DOI: 10.1177/003368829202300107

Storch, N. (2009). Comparing type of feedback and processing mode: Pair versus individual processing of feedback on writing. Paper delivered at the Second Language Writing Symposium, Phoenix, Arizona, November.

Storch, N. (2010). Critical feedback on written corrective feedback research. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2) 29–46.

Truscott, J. (1997). Review article: The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2) 327–69. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x

Truscott, J. (1999). The case of “the case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes”: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2) 111–22. DOI: 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80110-6

Zacharias, N. T. (2006). Teacher and student attitudes toward teacher feedback. RELC journal, 38(1), 38-52. DOI: 10.1177/0033688206076157

Zhang, X. (2017). Reading–writing integrated tasks, comprehensive corrective feedback, and EFL writing development. Language Teaching Research21(2), 217-240.