The Role of Mobile-assisted Language Learning on EFL Learners’ Development of Writing Accuracy, Fluency, and Complexity

Document Type: Research Paper


1 English Language Department, Bonab Branch, Islamic Azad university Bonab, Iran

2 Department of English, Bonab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran


The present study was an attempt to investigate the effectiveness of mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) in comparison to lack of it in improving learners’ writing accuracy, fluency, and complexity. To this end, a total of 39 English as a foreign language learners took part in the study. In the experimental group, learners were exposed to technologically enhanced writing practices through the Telegram application, where they were engaged in a collaborative writing task accomplished through interaction by the peers and the teacher as group members. The control group learners, on the contrary, wrote about the same topics on the paper without any collaboration from others. The results of statistical analysis revealed that although the writing fluency and complexity of experimental learners flourished in comparison to their control peers, the accuracy dimension followed a reverse pattern. In other words, control group learners were the ones who could improve their writing accuracy.The results are discussed in light of the assumption that synchronous interaction provides learners with more opportunities to write using a syntactically complex and fluent language which are in a trade-off relation with accuracy.


Article Title [Persian]

نقش یادگیری زبان با کمک تلفن همراه در توسعه دقت نوشتن ، تسلط و پیچیدگی نوشتن در زبان آموزان EFL

Authors [Persian]

  • لیلا احمدپور 1
  • محمد حسین یوسفی 2
Abstract [Persian]

مطالعه حاضر تلاشی برای بررسی تأثیر یادگیری زبان با کمک موبایل (MALL) در مقایسه با عدم وجود آن در بهبود صحت نوشتن ، روان بودن و پیچیدگی زبان آموزان است. برای این منظور ، در مجموع 39 زبان انگلیسی به عنوان یک زبان آموز خارجی در این مطالعه شرکت کردند. در گروه آزمایشی ، فراگیران از طریق برنامه تلگرام در معرض شیوه های نوشتن فن آوری پیشرفته قرار گرفتند ، جایی که آنها به یک کار نوشتن مشارکتی که از طریق تعامل همسالان و معلم به عنوان اعضای گروه انجام می شد ، مشغول بودند. برعکس ، فراگیران گروه کنترل ، درمورد همان مباحث روی کاغذ و بدون همکاری دیگران نوشتند. نتایج تحلیل آماری نشان داد که اگرچه تسلط نوشتن و پیچیدگی زبان آموزان تجربی در مقایسه با همتایان کنترل خود شکوفا می شود ، اما بعد دقت از یک الگوی معکوس پیروی می کند. به عبارت دیگر ، یادگیرندگان گروه کنترل کسانی بودند که می توانند صحت نوشتن خود را بهبود ببخشند. نتایج با توجه به این فرض که تعامل همزمان انجام می دهد ، به زبان آموزان فرصت بیشتری برای نوشتن با استفاده از یک زبان پیچیده و روان که به صورت مختلط و متناسب با آن هستند ، فراهم می کند. رابطه با دقت.

Keywords [Persian]

  • یادگیری زبان با کمک موبایل (MALL)
  • مهارت نوشتن
  • صحت
  • تسلط
  • پیچیدگی
Adams, R., Alwi, N. A. N. M., & Newton, J. (2015). Task complexity effects on the complexity and accuracy of writing via text chat. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 64-81.

Alwi, N. A. N. M., Adams, R., & Newton, J. (2012). Writing to learn via text chat: Task implementation and focus on form. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(1), 23-39.

Andujar, A. (2016). Benefits of mobile instant messaging to develop ESL writing. System, 62, 63-76.

Baleghizadeh, S., & Oladrostam, E. (2010). The effect of Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) on grammatical accuracy of EFL students. MEXTESOL Journal, 34(2),1-10.

Bruce, B.C., & Hogan, M.P. (1998). The disappearance of technology: Toward an ecological model of literacy. In D. Reinking, M.C. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R.D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformation in a post-typographic world (pp. 269-281). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Brown, J., &Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Harvard Business School Press.

Burston, J. (2014). The reality of MALL: Still on the fringes. CALICO Journal, 31(1), 103.

Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(4), 367-383.

Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters

Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299-324.

GencIlter, B. (2009). Effect of technology on motivation in EFL classrooms. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 10(4), 136-158.

Hashemi, M., & Aziznezhad, M. (2011). Computer assisted language learningfreedom or submission to machines? Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 832-835.

Horwitz, E. K. (1985). Surveying student beliefs about language learning and teaching in the foreign language methods course. Foreign Language Annals, 18(4), 333-340.

Jepson, K. (2005). Conversation and negotiated interaction in text and voice chat rooms. Language Learning & Technology, 9, 79-98.

Khezrlou, S. (2018). Form-focused instruction in CALL: What do learners think? RELC, 1-17.

Khezrlou, S., Ellis, R., & Sadeghi, K. (2017). Effects of computer-assisted glosses on EFL learners’ vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension in three learning conditions. System, 65, 104-116.

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning? ReCALL, 21(2), 157-165.

Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the sociogenesis of second language development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Levy, M., & Kennedy, C. (2005). Learning Italian via mobile SMS. In A. Kukulska-Hulme, & J. Traxler (Eds.), Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers (pp. 76-83). London, UK: Taylor and Francis.

Liu, P. L., & Chen, C. J. (2014). Learning English phrase through actions: A study of mobile-assisted language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(2), 158–171.

Motallebzadeh, K., Beh – Afarin, R., &Daliry Rad, S. (2011). The effect of short message service on the retention of collocations among Iranian lower intermediate EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(11),1514 – 1520.

Nation, I.S.P. (2001) Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pownell, D., & Bailey, G. (2001). Getting a handle on handhelds. Retrieved on August 2017 from http://www.electronicschool/2001/06/0601handhelds.html.

Rambe, P., & Bere, A. (2013). Using mobile instant messaging to leverage learner participation and transform pedagogy at a South African University of Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44,544-549.

Rau, P-L., Gao, Q., & Wu, L-M. (2008). Using mobile communication technology in high school education: Motivation, pressure, and learning performance. Computers and Education, 50(1), 1-22.

Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Skehan, P. (2014). Limited attentional capacity, second language performance, and task-based pedagogy. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (task-based language teaching) (pp. 211–260). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Song, Y. (2008). SMS enhanced vocabulary learning for mobile audiences. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organization, 2, 81-98.

Sotillo, S. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning & Technology, 4, 82-119.

Victori, M., & Lockhart, W. (1995). Enhancing metacognition in self-directed language learning. System, 23(2), 223-234.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wendel, J. (1997). Planning and second language narrative production. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Temple University, USA.

Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre‐task planning and on‐line planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1-27.

Zhao, Y. (2005). The future of research in technology and second language education.  In Y. Zhao (Ed.), Research in technology and second language learning: Developments and directions (pp. 445-457). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, Inc.